These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 3731706

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Omnipaque and urografin in arthrography of the knee.
    Farsø Nielsen F, de Carvalho A, Hjøllund Madsen E.
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 6731021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V, Heep H, Clauss W.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contrast media for CT. An analysis of the early pharmacokinetics.
    Jensen LI, Dean PB, Nyman U, Golman K.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Nov; 20(8):867-70. PubMed ID: 4077440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Kieffer SA.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Nov; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Cacayorin ED.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Nov; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
    Ahlgren P.
    Neuroradiology; 1982 Nov; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB, Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Shaw D.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Nov; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI, Golman K, Nyman U, Dean PB.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol.
    Rawlinson J, Hyde I, Williams J.
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.