These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 37319873

  • 21. Comparison of dysfunction with mechanical and porcine mitral valve prostheses.
    Magilligan DJ, Oyama C, Alam M.
    Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II129-34. PubMed ID: 4028355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Differences in Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft aortic valve hemodynamics. Effect of valve size.
    Khan SS, Mitchell RS, Derby GC, Oyer PE, Miller DC.
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV117-24. PubMed ID: 2225396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract in tetralogy of Fallot with a Hancock valve containing ventriculo-pulmonary conduit (author's transl)].
    Sievers HH, Yankah AC, Lange P, Stephan E, Bürsch JH, Bernhard A.
    Herz; 1979 Jun; 4(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 457028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves.
    Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 1531058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position.
    Nistal F, García-Satué E, Artiñano E, Durán CM, Gallo I.
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jan 01; 57(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 3942062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Hancock II bioprosthesis: a glance at the microscope in mid-long-term explants.
    Bottio T, Thiene G, Pettenazzo E, Ius P, Bortolotti U, Rizzoli G, Valfré C, Casarotto D, Valente M.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jul 01; 126(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 12878944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.
    Guerra F, Bortolotti U, Thiene G, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Talenti E, Stellin G, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May 01; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A 10-year comparison of mitral valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock porcine bioprostheses.
    Perier P, Deloche A, Chauvaud S, Chachques JC, Relland J, Fabiani JN, Stephan Y, Blondeau P, Carpentier A.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Jul 01; 48(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 2764601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Hancock Medical Association.
    Hall GW.
    Iowa Med J; 1856 Jun 01; 3(3):223-224. PubMed ID: 37677493
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Use of the valvular resistance in the separation of normal and stenotic Hancock mitral valves.
    Khan SS, Czer LS, Gray RJ, Matloff J.
    J Card Surg; 1988 Sep 01; 3(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 2980023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Hemodynamic evaluation of 23 mm Pericarbon and 23 mm Hancock II bioprostheses in the aortic position at mid-term follow up.
    Ius P, Totis O, Chirillo F, Cavarzerani A, Zussa C, Piccoli C, Valfrè C.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov 01; 5(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 8953444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Fate of Hancock valve in tricuspid position 36 years after implantation.
    Kitamura H, Kimura A, Okawa Y, Maeda M.
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct 01; 64(10):636-7. PubMed ID: 27369546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Not Available].
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Oct 16; 6(4):12. PubMed ID: 27523355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Long-term durability of the Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis.
    Rizzoli G, Bottio T, Thiene G, Toscano G, Casarotto D.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jul 16; 126(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 12878940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Porcine valve durability: a comparison between Hancock standard and Hancock II bioprostheses.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mossuto E, Mazzaro E, Thiene G, Casarotto D.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug 16; 60(2 Suppl):S216-20. PubMed ID: 7646162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery.
    Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct 16; 11(4 Suppl 1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10660158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J, Yu W, Silver MD, David TE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan 16; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The Hancock® Valved Conduit for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction in Sheep for Assessing New Devices.
    Carney JP, Zhang LM, Larson JJ, Lahti MT, Robinson NA, Dalmasso AP, Bianco RW.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Jul 16; 26(4):472-480. PubMed ID: 29302948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul 16; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis: excellent durability at intermediate-term follow-up.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzaro E, Thiene G, Talenti E, Casarotto D.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep 16; 24(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 8077538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.