These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
116 related items for PubMed ID: 37357382
1. Micro-CT evaluation of the effect of various ScRp instrumentation methods on cement loss, porosity and micro-crack formation. Yıldız H, Bagis N, Camgoz M, Karacaoglu F, Ocak M, Orhan K. Int J Dent Hyg; 2024 Aug; 22(3):588-595. PubMed ID: 37357382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the effects of different instrumentation techniques on root surface roughness and cement loss using micro-computerized tomography: An in-vitro study. Karacaoglu F, Orhan K. Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 34390126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, Levi P, Velásquez A, Sanz Moliner J. J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study. Maritato M, Orazi L, Laurito D, Formisano G, Serra E, Lollobrigida M, Molinari A, De Biase A. Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes. Eick S, Bender P, Flury S, Lussi A, Sculean A. Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 22526889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces: a SEM study. Tsurumaki Jdo N, Souto BH, Oliveira GJ, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio Júnior E, Marcantonio RA. Braz Dent J; 2011 Mar; 22(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 21915514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysing root roughness and smear layer relationship by comparing contemporary dental curettes with conventional dental curettes: a randomised controlled trial. Riaz S, Ahmed S, Shabbir S, Khan ZR, Zaidi SJA, Naeem MM, Farooqui WA. BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun 17; 22(1):237. PubMed ID: 35715802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Diamond burs versus curettes in root planing: a randomized clinical trial. Türktekin F, Buduneli N, Lappin DF, Türk T, Buduneli E. Aust Dent J; 2018 Jun 17; 63(2):242-252. PubMed ID: 29432640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study. Silva D, Martins O, Matos S, Lopes P, Rolo T, Baptista I. Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May 17; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study. Schlageter L, Rateitschak-Plüss EM, Schwarz JP. J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May 17; 23(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 8783052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultramorphology of the root surface subsequent to hand-ultrasonic simultaneous instrumentation during non-surgical periodontal treatments: an in vitro study. Aspriello SD, Piemontese M, Levrini L, Sauro S. J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 May 17; 19(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21437474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Leal PC, Gimenes-Sakima PP, Marcantonio E. Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun 17; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study. Obeid P, Bercy P. Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun 17; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study. Vastardis S, Yukna RA, Rice DA, Mercante D. J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May 17; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Root Surface Roughness Produced By Hand Instruments and Ultrasonic Scalers: An Invitro Study. Kumar P, Das SJ, Sonowal ST, Chawla J. J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Nov 17; 9(11):ZC56-60. PubMed ID: 26675445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Hand and Ultrasonic Scaling-Root Planing Methods on Tooth Surface Topography: An In-Vitro Atomic Force Microscopy Study. Kumari N, Johnson L, Yadav H, Das A, Umrao B, Gera R. Cureus; 2023 Oct 17; 15(10):e46925. PubMed ID: 38022287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces. Oliveira G, Macedo PD, Tsurumaki JN, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio R. Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug 17; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement. Dassatti L, Manicone PF, Lauricella S, Pastorino R, Filetici P, Nicoletti F, D'Addona A. Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug 17; 6(4):470-477. PubMed ID: 32573120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K. J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb 17; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro comparison of root surface roughness and bacterial adhesion following treatment with three different instruments. Haroon F, Gregory RL, Hara A, Blanchard SB, Hamada Y. J Periodontol; 2022 May 17; 93(5):e83-e91. PubMed ID: 34338309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]