These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 37367377

  • 1. Intraguild Prey Served as Alternative Prey for Intraguild Predators in a Reciprocal Predator Guild between Neoseiulus barkeri and Scolothrips takahashii.
    Liu M, Wang M, Nima Y, Feng X, Li G, Yang Y, Li Y, Liu H.
    Insects; 2023 Jun 16; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 37367377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Predatory interactions between prey affect patch selection by predators.
    Choh Y, Sabelis MW, Janssen A.
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017 Jun 16; 71(4):66. PubMed ID: 28356611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraguild interactions among three spider mite predators: predation preference and effects on juvenile development and oviposition.
    Rahmani H, Daneshmandi A, Walzer A.
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2015 Dec 16; 67(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 26462926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intraguild interactions between the predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis.
    Cakmak I, Janssen A, Sabelis MW.
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2006 Dec 16; 38(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 16550333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Does Long-Term Feeding on Alternative Prey Affect the Biological Performance of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the Target Spider Mites?
    Li YY, Zhang GH, Tian CB, Liu MX, Liu YQ, Liu H, Wang JJ.
    J Econ Entomol; 2017 Jun 01; 110(3):915-923. PubMed ID: 28334233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intra-guild vs extra-guild prey: effect on predator fitness and preference of Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae).
    Buitenhuis R, Shipp L, Scott-Dupree C.
    Bull Entomol Res; 2010 Apr 01; 100(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 19419591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey.
    Choh Y, van der Hammen T, Sabelis MW, Janssen A.
    Oecologia; 2010 Jun 01; 163(2):335-40. PubMed ID: 20354730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Functional responses and prey-stage preferences of a predatory gall midge and two predacious mites with twospotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae, as host.
    Xiao Y, Osborne LS, Chen J, McKenzie CL.
    J Insect Sci; 2013 Jun 01; 13():8. PubMed ID: 23879370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Spatiotemporal within-plant distribution of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae and associated specialist and generalist predators.
    Walzer A, Moder K, Schausberger P.
    Bull Entomol Res; 2009 Oct 01; 99(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 19159502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Alternative prey mediate intraguild predation in the open field.
    Snyder GB, Smith OM, Chapman EG, Crossley MS, Crowder DW, Fu Z, Harwood JD, Jensen AS, Krey KL, Lynch CA, Snyder WE.
    Pest Manag Sci; 2022 Sep 01; 78(9):3939-3946. PubMed ID: 35124892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.