These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems. Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R. Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin. Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA. Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study. Zhong M, Chen WJ, Lu XY, Qian J, Zhu CQ. J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec 01; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study. Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar. Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 01; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M. Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 01; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC. BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium. BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding. Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 04; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Tantai XX, Liu N, Yang LB, Wei ZC, Xiao CL, Song YH, Wang JH. World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec 07; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H. Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ko IG, Kim SE, Chang BS, Kwak MS, Yoon JY, Cha JM, Shin HP, Lee JI, Kim SH, Han JH, Jeon JW. BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec 12; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB. Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr 12; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ. Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 12; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland. Rivieri S, Carron PN, Schoepfer A, Ageron FX. Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb 01; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China. Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J. BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding. Noh JH, Cha B, Ahn JY, Na HK, Lee JH, Jung KW, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY. Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep 09; 101(36):e30410. PubMed ID: 36086775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H. Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun 09; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding. Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P. Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 09; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]