These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


133 related items for PubMed ID: 37395327

  • 1. CAD-CAM and analog occlusal splints comparison based on the amount of occlusal adjustments. 3D analysis of the volumetric changes: A pilot study.
    Blasi A, Henarejos-Domingo V, Palacios-Bañuelos R, Vidal-Ponsoda C, Aparicio C, Roig M.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1271-1278. PubMed ID: 37395327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison accuracy of digital and analog method using milled occlusal splints.
    Blasi Á, Henarejos-Domingo V, Palacios-Bañuelos R, Aparicio C, Roig M.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Oct; 35(7):1103-1112. PubMed ID: 36942721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: A crossover clinical trial.
    Karasan D, Sailer I, Lee H, Demir F, Zarauz C, Akca K.
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104365. PubMed ID: 36403691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy and its impact on fit of injection molded, milled and additively manufactured occlusal splints.
    Wesemann C, Spies BC, Schaefer D, Adali U, Beuer F, Pieralli S.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104179. PubMed ID: 33189599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
    Orgev A, Levon JA, Chu TG, Morton D, Lin WS.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Crown adjustment and chairside efficiency of single-unit restorations fabricated from immediate and staged impressions using a digital workflow for posterior implants.
    Ren S, Jiang X, Lin Y, Di P.
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Aug; 33(7):637-644. PubMed ID: 38526488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fully digital workflow for the fabrication of occlusal stabilization splints based on individual mandibular movement.
    Sun X, Feng Y, Jiao Y, Liu W.
    J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104826. PubMed ID: 38157975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Auxiliary occlusal devices for IO scanning in a complete digital workflow of implant-supported crowns: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ren S, Jiang X, Di P.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar 22; 24(1):374. PubMed ID: 38519905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of laboratory-made and CAD-CAM-fabricated occlusal devices to treat oral parafunction.
    Brandt S, Brandt J, Lauer HC, Kunzmann A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug 22; 122(2):123-128. PubMed ID: 30853140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of half-digital workflows on the adaptation of custom CAD-CAM composite post-and-cores.
    Perucelli F, Goulart da Costa R, Machado de Souza E, Rached RN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec 22; 126(6):756-762. PubMed ID: 33127081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Preliminary clinical application of complete digital workflow of design and manufacturing occlusal splint for sleep bruxism].
    Wang SM, Li Z, Wang GB, Ye HQ, Liu YS, Tong D, Gao WH, Zhou YS.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb 18; 51(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 30773553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul 18; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Quantitative clinical adjustment analysis of posterior single implant crown in a chairside digital workflow: A randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang Y, Tian J, Wei D, Di P, Lin Y.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov 18; 30(11):1059-1066. PubMed ID: 31357225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Comparison of the Accuracy Between a Digital Fabrication Workflow and a Conventional Fabrication Workflow for Occlusal Appliances: A Pilot Study.
    Lin R, Yan YQ, Sun J, Yu CH.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep 12; 36(4):501-507. PubMed ID: 37699192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.