These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

234 related items for PubMed ID: 37426406

  • 1. Fracture Strength of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Ceramic Materials: An In-Vitro Study.
    Alshali S, Attar E.
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41531. PubMed ID: 37426406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study.
    El Ghoul WA, Özcan M, Ounsi H, Tohme H, Salameh Z.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):128-134. PubMed ID: 31027958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review.
    AlHelal AA.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan 16; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns.
    Fayyazi A, Habibi L, Heidari B, Tavakolizadeh S.
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2023 Mar 16; 24(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 36864996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Adaptations of CAD/CAM Endocrowns and Crowns Fabricated from Three Different Materials.
    Hasanzade M, Sahebi M, Zarrati S, Payaminia L, Alikhasi M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar 16; 34(3):341–347. PubMed ID: 31856266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Retention of different CAD/CAM endocrowns bonded to severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study.
    Elashmawy Y, Aboushelib M, Elshahawy W.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021 Mar 16; 21(3):269-275. PubMed ID: 34380814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and fracture strength of endocrowns manufactured with different restorative materials: SEM and mechanical evaluation.
    Sağlam G, Cengiz S, Karacaer Ö.
    Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Feb 16; 84(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 32915479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of preparation design on fracture resistance of molars restored with occlusal veneers of different CAD-CAM materials: an in vitro study.
    Taha AI, Hafez ME.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct 01; 24(1):1168. PubMed ID: 39354422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging.
    Taha D, Spintzyk S, Sabet A, Wahsh M, Salah T.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jul 01; 30(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 30113129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System.
    Kobayashi M, Niizuma Y, Sugai R, Manabe A.
    Oper Dent; 2023 Nov 01; 48(6):657-665. PubMed ID: 37882476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns with Different Intracoronal Depths and Restorative Materials Luted with Various Resin Cements.
    Ghajghouj O, Taşar-Faruk S.
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Aug 08; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 31398883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparison of fracture strength of two chairside CAD/CAM ceramic blocs with different thickness].
    Lin CG, Hu XK, Yan YX, Qu YH, Liu M, Zhang FM.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Feb 08; 30(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 33907771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis.
    Zheng Z, He Y, Ruan W, Ling Z, Zheng C, Gai Y, Yan W.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun 08; 125(6):890-899. PubMed ID: 32471627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative analysis of endocrown fracture resistance and marginal adaptation: CAD/CAM technology using lithium disilicate vs. zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics.
    Jalalian E, Zarbakhsh A, Khorshidi S, Golalipour S, Mohammadnasl S, Sayyari M.
    Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb 08; 36(2):353-358. PubMed ID: 38420004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.