These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

321 related items for PubMed ID: 37432485

  • 1. Comparative analysis of 5-year efficacy and outcomes of single anastomosis procedures as revisional surgery for weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy.
    Salama AF, Baazaoui J, Shahid F, Singh R, Torres AJ, Bashah MM.
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7548-7555. PubMed ID: 37432485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as Revisional Procedures for Patients with Weight Recidivism After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes.
    Bashah M, Aleter A, Baazaoui J, El-Menyar A, Torres A, Salama A.
    Obes Surg; 2020 Dec; 30(12):4715-4723. PubMed ID: 32845477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OABG) vs. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) as revisional procedure following Sleeve Gastrectomy: results of a multicenter study.
    Gallucci P, Marincola G, Pennestrì F, Procopio PF, Prioli F, Salvi G, Ciccoritti L, Greco F, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Franzese A, Mansi F, Uccelli M, Cesana G, Musella M, Olmi S, Raffaelli M.
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Apr 16; 409(1):128. PubMed ID: 38627302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) vs Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a Systematic Review of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery.
    Balamurugan G, Leo SJ, Sivagnanam ST, Balaji Prasad S, Ravindra C, Rengan V, Arora E, Bindal V.
    Obes Surg; 2023 Jul 16; 33(7):2194-2209. PubMed ID: 37140720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Revisional Laparoscopic SADI-S vs. Duodenal Switch Following Failed Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Comparison of 101 Consecutive Cases.
    Osorio J, Lazzara C, Admella V, Franci-León S, Pujol-Gebellí J.
    Obes Surg; 2021 Aug 16; 31(8):3667-3674. PubMed ID: 33982240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery.
    Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, Gong F, Wu A, Dong G.
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Nov 16; 14(11):1686-1690. PubMed ID: 30220645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-gastric Bypass for Treatment of Obesity: a Retrospective Cohort Comparative Study with 6 years follow-up.
    Salvi P, Kosta S, Fobi M, Bhandari M, Reddy M, Gusani R, Khurana M, Benamro F, Mathur W, Bhandari M.
    Obes Surg; 2020 Apr 16; 30(4):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 31898044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional bariatric surgery for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedure.
    Mouawad C, Dahboul H, Chamaa B, Osseis M, Noun R, Chakhtoura G.
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jan 16; 17(1):e13248. PubMed ID: 37750456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety.
    Barajas-Gamboa JS, Moon S, Romero-Velez G, Strong AT, Allemang M, Navarrete S, Corcelles R, Rodriguez J, Kroh M, Dang JT.
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov 16; 37(11):8682-8689. PubMed ID: 37500921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission: the Role of Mini Gastric Bypass/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy at 1 Year of Follow-up. A European survey.
    Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, Ribeiro R, Manno E, Greco F, Čierny M, Milone M, Di Stefano C, Guler S, Van Lessen IM, Guerra A, Maglio MN, Bonfanti R, Novotna R, Coretti G, Piazza L.
    Obes Surg; 2016 May 16; 26(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26341086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-term outcomes of revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
    AlSabah S, Al Haddad E, Al-Subaie S, Ekrouf S, Almulla A, Alhaddad M, Aljabal MS, Alenezi K.
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan 19; 408(1):43. PubMed ID: 36656465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Single- or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee Y, Ellenbogen Y, Doumouras AG, Gmora S, Anvari M, Hong D.
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Apr 19; 15(4):556-566. PubMed ID: 30837111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hany M, Zidan A, Elmongui E, Torensma B.
    Obes Surg; 2022 Nov 19; 32(11):3491-3503. PubMed ID: 36098907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The first case report of failed single-anastomosis-duodeno-ileal bypass converted to One anastomosis gastric bypass/Mini-gastric bypass.
    Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O, Theodoridou S, Weiner R.
    Int J Surg Case Rep; 2017 Nov 19; 35():68-72. PubMed ID: 28448862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Single Anastomosis Jejuno-ileal (SAJI): a New Model of Malabsorptive Revisional Procedure for Insufficient Weight Loss or Weight Regain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.
    De Luca M, Piatto G, Sartori A, Zese M, Lunardi C, Targa S, Giardiello C, Gentileschi P, Himpens J.
    Obes Surg; 2022 Sep 19; 32(9):3194-3204. PubMed ID: 35763129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.