These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 3744737

  • 1. Effects of contrast media on cultured myocardial cells.
    Davis WL, Nelson JA, Barry WH.
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 3744737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of contrast media on calcium transients and motion in cultured ventricular cells.
    Bell DA, Peeters GA, Davis WL, Kohmoto O, Nelson JA, Barry WH.
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 2850282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, Brush KA, Levin DC.
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans.
    Mancini GB, Atwood JE, Bhargava V, Slutsky RA, Grover M, Higgins CB.
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Jan 01; 53(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 6691265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.
    Higgins CB, Gerber KH, Mattrey RF, Slutsky RA.
    Radiology; 1982 Mar 01; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Inotropic effects of ionic contrast media: the role of calcium binding additives.
    Murdock DK, Walsh J, Euler DE, Kozeny G, Scanlon PJ.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1984 Mar 01; 10(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 6440712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, Shabetai R, Higgins CB.
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr 01; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Combined actions of verapamil and contrast media on atrioventricular conduction. Influence of osmolality of the media.
    Peck WW, Slutsky RA, Mancini GB, Higgins CB.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Apr 01; 19(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 6469525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Coronary angiography with iohexol and other contrast media in the dog. III. Contractility of the left ventricle.
    Trägårdh B, Cederlund C.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980 Apr 01; 362():25-7. PubMed ID: 6267889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of low osmolality contrast materials on coronary hemodynamics, myocardial function, and coronary sinus osmolality in normal and ischemic states.
    Deutsch AL, Gerber KH, Haigler FH, Higgins CB.
    Invest Radiol; 1982 Apr 01; 17(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 7118517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of a new nonionic and a conventional ionic contrast agent on coronary sinus ionized calcium and left ventricular hemodynamics in dogs.
    Bourdillon PD, Bettmann MA, McCracken S, Poole-Wilson PA, Grossman W.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Oct 01; 6(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 4031299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Regional myocardial hemodynamic and metabolic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media in normal and ischemic states.
    Gerber KH, Higgins CB, Yuh YS, Koziol JA.
    Circulation; 1982 Jun 01; 65(7):1307-14. PubMed ID: 7074792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW, Harnish PP, Reece K, Katzberg RW.
    Invest Radiol; 1983 Jun 01; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Coronary angiography with iohexol and other contrast media in the dog. II. Left ventricular contractility and work.
    Trägårdh B.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980 Jun 01; 362():21-4. PubMed ID: 6267888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative effects of ionic anc nonionic contrast materials on coronary and peripheral blood flow.
    Gerber KH, Higgins CB.
    Invest Radiol; 1982 Jun 01; 17(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 7118518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of contrast media on aortic endothelium. Experiments in the rat with non-ionic monomeric and monoacidic dimeric contrast media.
    Nyman U, Almén T.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980 Jun 01; 362():65-71. PubMed ID: 6168170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Coronary angiography during acute myocardial infarction in dogs. A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Piao ZE, Murdock DK, Hwang MH, Gries W, Raymond RM, Scanlon PJ.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1988 Nov 01; 101(11):828-32. PubMed ID: 3150724
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cardiovascular effects of iohexol in the rat and the isolated rabbit heart.
    Haberey M, Schröder G, Mannesmann G.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980 Nov 01; 362():29-35. PubMed ID: 6267890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Direct pharmacologic and osmolal effects of contrast media on the mechanics of heart muscle isolated from cats.
    Chuck LH, Refsum H, Rouleau JL, Mathey D, Sievers RE, Parmley WW.
    Am Heart J; 1984 Jul 01; 108(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 6428210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI, Golman K, Nyman U, Dean PB.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec 01; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.