These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 3744798

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
    Paige C, Karnofsky EB.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe.
    Kerr K.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict.
    Berseth CL.
    Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
    Brown LD.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986 Sep; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF.
    America (NY); 1986 Mar 06; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Baby Doe redux: doctors as child abusers.
    Annas GJ.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct 06; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 6643033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ, Balch BJ.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 06; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
    Rhoden NK, Arras JD.
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985 Feb 06; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ruling on Baby Doe: impact limited.
    Malcolm AH.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun 11; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646486
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations.
    Bermel J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec 11; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
    Reiser SJ.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986 Dec 11; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.