These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 3745836

  • 1. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
    Reiser SJ.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
    Paige C, Karnofsky EB.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
    Brown LD.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
    Robertson JA.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA.
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Making decisions for the severely handicapped newborn.
    Freeman JM.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 3745841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations.
    Annas GJ.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 3744798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
    Steinbock B.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat.
    Huefner DS.
    Am J Law Med; 1986 Feb; 12(2):171-205. PubMed ID: 2964778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ, Balch BJ.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ethics committees for infants doe?
    Fleischman AR, Murray TH.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):5-9. PubMed ID: 6228539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict.
    Berseth CL.
    Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.