These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 37464091

  • 1. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.
    Cheatham MA.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 24(4):413-428. PubMed ID: 37464091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A.
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Investigation of the 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 distortion product otoacoustic emissions using a computational model of the gerbil ear.
    Wen H, Bowling T, Meaud J.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():127-140. PubMed ID: 29801982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP, Nelson K, Davis T, Dorn PA, Neely ST.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Phase delay measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 in human ears.
    Wable J, Collet L, Chéry-Croze S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2228-35. PubMed ID: 8865631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Group delays of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig.
    Schneider S, Prijs VF, Schoonhoven R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2722-30. PubMed ID: 10335624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?
    Liberman MC, Zuo J, Guinan JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 15478431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J, Bartlett EL.
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW, Glattke TJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.