These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 37480997

  • 1. Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients: Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography.
    Gietzen C, Pennig L, von Stein J, Guthoff H, Weiss K, Gertz R, Thürbach I, Bunck AC, Maintz D, Baldus S, Ten Freyhaus H, Hohmann C, von Stein P.
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Nov 01; 390():131203. PubMed ID: 37480997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering with CE-MRA in imaging of the thoracic aorta.
    Pennig L, Wagner A, Weiss K, Lennartz S, Huntgeburth M, Hickethier T, Maintz D, Naehle CP, Bunck AC, Doerner J.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan 01; 37(1):315-329. PubMed ID: 32852711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Agreement of Proximal Thoracic Aorta Size by Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography.
    Agdamag AC, Patel P, Duval S, Konety S.
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Apr 15; 193():28-33. PubMed ID: 36863269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Exact monitoring of aortic diameters in Marfan patients without gadolinium contrast: intraindividual comparison of 2D SSFP imaging with 3D CE-MRA and echocardiography.
    Veldhoen S, Behzadi C, Derlin T, Rybczinsky M, von Kodolitsch Y, Sheikhzadeh S, Henes FO, Bley TA, Adam G, Bannas P.
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar 15; 25(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 25316057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessment of aortic diameter in Marfan patients: intraindividual comparison of 3D-Dixon and 2D-SSFP magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wright F, Warncke M, Sinn M, Ristow I, Lenz A, Riedel C, Schoennagel BP, Zhang S, Kaul MG, Adam G, von Kodolitsch Y, Sehner S, Bannas P.
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar 15; 33(3):1687-1697. PubMed ID: 36269370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative assessment of ascending aortic aneurysms in Marfan patients using ECG-gated computerized tomographic angiography versus trans-thoracic echocardiography.
    Amsallem M, Ou P, Milleron O, Henry-Feugeas MC, Detaint D, Arnoult F, Vahanian A, Jondeau G.
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr 01; 184():22-27. PubMed ID: 25705006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome: intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with echocardiography.
    Bannas P, Groth M, Rybczynski M, Sheikhzadeh S, von Kodolitsch Y, Graessner J, Lund G, Adam G, Habermann CR.
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jul 15; 167(1):190-6. PubMed ID: 22240770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dilation of peripheral vessels in Marfan syndrome: importance of thoracoabdominal MR angiography.
    Mariucci EM, Lovato L, Rosati M, Palena LM, Bonvicini M, Fattori R.
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep 10; 167(6):2928-31. PubMed ID: 22954416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multimodality Assessment of Ascending Aortic Diameters: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods.
    Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Teixidó-Tura G, Galuppo V, Cuéllar H, Laynez A, Gutiérrez L, González-Alujas MT, García-Dorado D, Evangelista A.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Sep 10; 29(9):819-826.e4. PubMed ID: 27288090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements.
    Weinrich JM, Avanesov M, Lenz A, Tahir E, Henes FO, Schoennagel BP, Rybczinsky M, Adam G, von Kodolitsch Y, Bannas P.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug 10; 36(8):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 32314122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of proximal aortic diameter in hypertensive patients: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Leone D, Tosello F, Faletti R, Schivazappa G, Bruno G, Avenatti E, Ravera A, Veglio F, Milan A.
    J Hypertens; 2017 Aug 10; 35(8):1626-1634. PubMed ID: 28399041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Imaging of the pulmonary vasculature in congenital heart disease without gadolinium contrast: Intraindividual comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified REACT with 4D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
    Pennig L, Wagner A, Weiss K, Lennartz S, Grunz JP, Maintz D, Laukamp KR, Hickethier T, Naehle CP, Bunck AC, Doerner J.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jan 23; 22(1):8. PubMed ID: 31969137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
    van der Linde D, Rossi A, Yap SC, McGhie JS, van den Bosch AE, Kirschbaum SW, Russo B, van Dijk AP, Moelker A, Krestin GP, van Geuns RJ, Roos-Hesselink JW.
    Echocardiography; 2013 May 23; 30(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23305528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intermodality variation of aortic dimensions: How, where and when to measure the ascending aorta.
    Bons LR, Duijnhouwer AL, Boccalini S, van den Hoven AT, van der Vlugt MJ, Chelu RG, McGhie JS, Kardys I, van den Bosch AE, Siebelink HJ, Nieman K, Hirsch A, Broberg CS, Budde RPJ, Roos-Hesselink JW.
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Feb 01; 276():230-235. PubMed ID: 30213599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison between proximal thoracic vascular measurements obtained by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and by transthoracic echocardiography in infants and children with congenital heart disease.
    Madan N, Yau JL, Srivastava S, Nielsen JC.
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2013 Mar 01; 34(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 22923009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Updated 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline Improves Concordance Between TTE and CT in Monitoring Marfan Snydrome and Related Disorders, but Relevant Measurement Differences Remain Frequent.
    Kolck J, Trippel TD, Philipp K, Gehle P, Geisel D, Beetz NL.
    Glob Heart; 2024 Mar 01; 23():28. PubMed ID: 38737456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Transthoracic Echocardiography versus Computed Tomography for Ascending Aortic Measurements in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
    Park JY, Foley TA, Bonnichsen CR, Maurer MJ, Goergen KM, Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M, Williamson EE, Michelena HI.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Jul 01; 30(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28501375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multimodality Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Dimensions: Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Echocardiography Measurements.
    Frazao C, Tavoosi A, Wintersperger BJ, Nguyen ET, Wald RM, Ouzounian M, Hanneman K.
    J Thorac Imaging; 2020 Nov 01; 35(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 32251236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Free-breathing non-contrast flow-independent cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using cardiac gated, magnetization-prepared 3D Dixon method: assessment of thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease.
    Isaak A, Luetkens JA, Faron A, Endler C, Mesropyan N, Katemann C, Zhang S, Kupczyk P, Kuetting D, Attenberger U, Dabir D.
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jul 19; 23(1):91. PubMed ID: 34275486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Aortic Measurements in Patients with Aortopathy are Larger and More Reproducible by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Compared with Echocardiography.
    Nejatian A, Yu J, Geva T, White MT, Prakash A.
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2015 Dec 19; 36(8):1761-73. PubMed ID: 26174757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.