These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 37544512

  • 1. The clinical impact of early detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales with PCR-based blood culture assays.
    Chang KM, Haghamad A, Saunders-Hao P, Shaffer A, Mirsaidi N, Zimilover A, Epstein M, Jain S, Streva V, Juretschko S, Demissie S, Gautam-Goyal P.
    Am J Infect Control; 2024 Jan; 52(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 37544512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Examining the clinical impact of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections in a national cohort of the Veterans Health Administration.
    Britt NS, Khader K, He T, Willson TM, Effiong A, Timbrook TT, Potter EM, Lodise TP.
    Pharmacotherapy; 2023 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 36484553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures.
    Tansarli GS, Chapin KC.
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct 26; 10(5):e0179622. PubMed ID: 36069598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Impact of Integrating Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the United Arab of Emirates.
    Nasef R, El Lababidi R, Alatoom A, Krishnaprasad S, Bonilla F.
    Int J Infect Dis; 2020 Feb 26; 91():124-128. PubMed ID: 31786245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Benefits of Adding a Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.
    MacVane SH, Nolte FS.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Oct 26; 54(10):2455-63. PubMed ID: 27487951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of BioFire® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panels on antibiotic management of bacteremia due to select organisms.
    Vyas S, Patel D, Bandali A, Giordano P, Roland R, Kessler J.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Sep 26; 110(1):116384. PubMed ID: 39002446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction blood culture identification technology on outcomes in patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcal bacteremia.
    MacVane SH, Hurst JM, Boger MS, Gnann JW.
    Infect Dis (Lond); 2016 Oct 26; 48(10):732-7. PubMed ID: 27196015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of Broad-Panel PCR-Based Bacterial Identification for Blood Cultures in a Pediatric Oncology Population.
    Garner CD, Brazelton de Cardenas J, Suganda S, Hayden RT.
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep 03; 9(1):e0022121. PubMed ID: 34232100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia.
    Bryant S, Almahmoud I, Pierre I, Bardet J, Touati S, Maubon D, Cornet M, Richarme C, Maurin M, Pavese P, Caspar Y.
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020 Sep 03; 10():594951. PubMed ID: 33324578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
    Chiasson JM, Smith WJ, Jodlowski TZ, Kouma MA, Cutrell JB.
    J Pharm Pract; 2022 Oct 03; 35(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 33813935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparing the Clinical Utility of Rapid Diagnostics for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Using Desirability of Outcome Ranking Approach for the Management of Antibiotic Therapy (DOOR-MAT).
    Claeys KC, Hopkins TL, Schlaffer K, Hitchcock S, Jiang Y, Evans S, Johnson JK, Leekha S.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2021 Aug 17; 65(9):e0044121. PubMed ID: 34228533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based organism identification of gram-positive cocci for patients with a single positive blood culture.
    MacVane SH, Raux BR, Smith TT.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Aug 17; 38(8):1471-1479. PubMed ID: 31079314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.
    McCarty TP, Cumagun P, Meeder J, Moates D, Edwards WS, Hutchinson J, Lee RA, Leal SM.
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Feb 14; 11(1):e0409222. PubMed ID: 36688641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hospital mortality and length of stay associated with Enterobacterales positive blood cultures: a multicenter analysis.
    Cooper L, Yu K, Van Benten K, Patkar A, Ye G, Gregory S, Ai C, Gupta V.
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Aug 06; 12(8):e0040224. PubMed ID: 38953323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel.
    Wolk DM, Young S, Whitfield NN, Reid JL, Thornberg A, Carroll KC, Buchan BW, Davis TE, Salimnia H.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Aug 18; 59(9):e0248420. PubMed ID: 34232066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.