These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

193 related items for PubMed ID: 3754920

  • 1. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH, Zwicker E, Scherer H, Seifert J, Leysieffer H, Zollner M.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J, Schön F.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].
    Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Laszig R.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [An implant for stimulation of the acoustic nerve with 12 channels].
    Zwicker E, Leysieffer H, Dinter K.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3754919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR, Ruth RA, Thomas JF.
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Preliminary studies of deaf patients assessed for cochlear implantation].
    Schorn K, Seifert J, Stecker M, Zollner M.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 3012229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978 Jun; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes ML.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C, Kaider A, Hamzavi J.
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
    Clark GM, Blamey PJ, Brown AM, Gusby PA, Dowell RC, Franz BK, Pyman BC, Shepherd RK, Tong YC, Webb RL.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nucleus 20-channel and 21-channel auditory brain stem implants: first European experiences.
    Laszig R, Sollmann WP, Marangos N, Charachon R, Ramsden R.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():28-30. PubMed ID: 7668669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [No Hearing Sensation after cochlear implantation despite successful objective measurement outcome].
    Gärtner L, Büchner A, Joseph G, Neuburger J, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Apr; 90(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 21181621
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K, Fischer RE.
    Med Prog Technol; 1981 Jun 12; 8(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 6895542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The cochlear prosthesis: a review of the design and evaluation of electrode implants for the profoundly deaf.
    Spelman FA.
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1982 Jun 12; 8(3):223-52. PubMed ID: 6754255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Extracochlear sixteen-channel electrode system.
    Banfai P, Karczag A, Kubik S, Lüers P, Sürth W.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May 12; 19(2):371-408. PubMed ID: 3754953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Current status of electrostimulation of auditory nerve fibers with cochlear implants].
    Burian K.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1992 May 12; 142(11-12):264-73. PubMed ID: 1529619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.