These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

135 related items for PubMed ID: 37574047

  • 21. Maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio distinguishes growth-restricted from non-growth-restricted small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Rajiv P, Cade T, Dean J, Jones GD, Brennecke SP.
    AJOG Glob Rep; 2024 Feb; 4(1):100302. PubMed ID: 38318268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Using ultrasound and angiogenic markers from a 19- to 23-week assessment to inform the subsequent diagnosis of preeclampsia.
    Lai J, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):294.e1-294.e11. PubMed ID: 35276067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. World Health Organization fetal growth charts applied in a French birth cohort.
    Hocquette A, Zeitlin J, Heude B, Ego A, Charles MA, Monier I.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102308. PubMed ID: 34998974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Case for hybrid "fetal growth curves": a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age.
    Bernstein IM, Mohs G, Rucquoi M, Badger GJ.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996 Mar; 5(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 8796781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Neonatal and fetal growth charts to identify preterm infants <30 weeks gestation at risk of adverse outcomes.
    Boghossian NS, Geraci M, Edwards EM, Horbar JD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):195.e1-195.e14. PubMed ID: 29750954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population.
    Stampalija T, Ghi T, Rosolen V, Rizzo G, Ferrazzi EM, Prefumo F, Dall'Asta A, Quadrifoglio M, Todros T, Frusca T, SIEOG working group on fetal biometric charts.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():323-329. PubMed ID: 32653605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts.
    Hoftiezer L, Hof MHP, Dijs-Elsinga J, Hogeveen M, Hukkelhoven CWPM, van Lingen RA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):383.e1-383.e17. PubMed ID: 30576661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Intrauterine growth patterns in rural Ethiopia compared with WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st growth standards: A community-based longitudinal study.
    Roro M, Deressa W, Lindtjørn B.
    PLoS One; 2019 Feb; 14(12):e0226881. PubMed ID: 31891599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
    Zhang-Rutledge K, Mack LM, Mastrobattista JM, Gandhi M.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Which chart and which cut-point: deciding on the INTERGROWTH, World Health Organization, or Hadlock fetal growth chart.
    Liauw J, Mayer C, Albert A, Fernandez A, Hutcheon JA.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jan 10; 22(1):25. PubMed ID: 35012473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B, Agarwal U, Jackson R, Alfirevic Z, Sharp A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr 10; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Fetal weight change close to term is proportional to the birthweight percentile.
    Stephens KJ, Kaza N, Shaw CJ, Lees CC.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Feb 10; 257():84-87. PubMed ID: 33370667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.
    Kiefer MK, Finneran MM, Ware CA, Foy P, Thung SF, Gabbe SG, Landon MB, Grobman WA, Venkatesh KK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec 10; 60(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 36099480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Accuracy of antenatal ultrasound in predicting large-for-gestational-age babies: population-based cohort study.
    Ewington LJ, Hugh O, Butler E, Quenby S, Gardosi J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May 07. PubMed ID: 38723984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.