These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Evaluation of a simplified sucrose gradient method for the detection of rubella-specific IgM in routine diagnostic practice. Caul EO, Hobbs SJ, Roberts PC, Clarke SK. J Med Virol; 1978; 2(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 670949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Rubella IgG total antibody avidity and IgG subclass-specific antibody avidity assay and their role in the differentiation between primary rubella and rubella reinfection. Enders G, Knotek F. Infection; 1989; 17(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 2767764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A solid-phase immunosorbent technique for the rapid detection of rubella IgM by haemagglutination inhibition. Krech U, Wilhelm JA. J Gen Virol; 1979 Aug; 44(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 392050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnosis of postnatal rubella by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella IgM and IgG antibodies. Vejtorp M, Fanøe E, Leerhoy J. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B; 1979 Jun; 87B(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 382737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of two commercial ELISA kits for detection of rubella specific IgM in suspected congenital rubella syndrome cases and rubella IgG antibodies in a serosurvey of pregnant women. Viswanathan R, George S, Murhekar MV, Abraham AM, Singh MP, Jadhav SM, Nag V, Naik S, Raut C, Munivenkatappa A, Gupta M, Jagtap V, Kaduskar O, Gupta N, Sapkal GN. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Jul; 94(3):243-247. PubMed ID: 30782464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Usefulness of determining low-avidity IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of primary rubella infection in pregnant women]. Lafarga B, Noguera FJ, Pérez MC, Copado R, García A, Soria E. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1998 Nov; 16(9):413-8. PubMed ID: 9887628 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Use of a rapid method for determining primary infection by rubella virus]. Nates S, Ferreira Centeno A, Márquez A, Zapata M. Rev Argent Microbiol; 1987 Nov; 19(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 2845475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The development of an M antibody capture ELISA for rubella IgM. Bellamy K, Rousseau SA, Gardner PS. J Virol Methods; 1986 Nov; 14(3-4):243-51. PubMed ID: 3539958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A simplified method for the detection of rubella-specific IgM employing sucrose density fractionation and 2-mercaptoethanol. Caul EO, Smyth GW, Clarke SK. J Hyg (Lond); 1974 Dec; 73(3):329-40. PubMed ID: 4216603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of automated immunoassays for immune status screening and serodiagnosis of rubella virus infection. Abbott GG, Safford JW, MacDonald RG, Craine MC, Applegren RR. J Virol Methods; 1990 Feb; 27(2):227-39. PubMed ID: 2318930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of radioimmunoassay and the gel filtration technique for routine diagnosis of rubella during pregnancy. Kangro HO, Jackson C, Heath RB. J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 7288178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining antibody to rubella virus. Shekarchi IC, Sever JL, Tzan N, Ley A, Ward LC, Madden D. J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):850-4. PubMed ID: 7016910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]