These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 37605302

  • 1. Clinical effect of Nobel Biocare angulated screw channel crown compared with cement crown in the aesthetic area: A retrospective cohort study with a mean 32 months follow-up (range 12 to 70 months).
    Yang H, Xu L, Jiang J, Xu Y, Li X, He F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Dec; 25(6):1178-1186. PubMed ID: 37605302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical, radiographic, and immunological evaluation of angulated screw-retained and cemented single-implant crowns in the esthetic region: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lv XL, Qian SJ, Qiao SC, Gu YX, Lai HC, Shi JY.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 34390601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Short-term comparison of the clinical efficacy of angulated screw-retained implant crowns and cemented implant crowns in esthetics region].
    Lyu XL, Shi JY, Qian SJ, Lai HC.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2022 Aug; 31(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 36710559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A prospective study on single tooth reconstructions using parallel walled implants with internal connection (NobelParallel CC) and abutments with angulated screw channels (ASC).
    Friberg B, Ahmadzai M.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 21(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 30779294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of biological, mechanical, and patient-reported outcomes of angulated screw channel abutments versus multi-unit abutment-retained single-unit implant restorations in the anterior esthetic zone: An-in vivo study.
    Varshney N, Kusum CK, Trivedi A, Kaushik M, Dubey P, Bali Y.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023 Apr; 23(3):244-252. PubMed ID: 37929363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Abutment screw torque changes with straight and angled screw-access channels.
    Swamidass RS, Kan JYK, Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Lozada J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):675-681. PubMed ID: 32439126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Frequency of screw-retained angulated screw channel single crown following immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: A cone beam computed tomography study.
    Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Kamolroongwarakul P, Lin GH, Matsuda H, Yin S, Wang HL, Tarnow D, Lozada JL.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):789-794. PubMed ID: 37232408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: A 1-year prospective case series study.
    Pol CWP, Raghoebar GM, Maragkou Z, Cune MS, Meijer HJA.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 31793193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of cyclic loading on reverse torque values of angled screw channel systems.
    Mulla SH, Seghi RR, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):458-466. PubMed ID: 33612334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in augmented and nonaugmented sites: a prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients.
    Santing HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Meijer HJ.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 22540833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture Strength of Implant Screw-Retained All-Ceramic Crowns with the Use of the Angulated Screw Channel: A Pilot Study.
    Drew A, Randi A, DiPede L, Luke A.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2020 Aug; 40(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 32032409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical performance of posterior monolithic zirconia implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with angulated screw channels: A 3-year prospective cohort study.
    Di Fiore A, Granata S, Monaco C, Stellini E, Yilmaz B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):566-572. PubMed ID: 34344529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Peri-implant conditions and marginal bone loss around cemented and screw-retained single implant crowns in posterior regions: A retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years follow-up.
    Shi JY, Jie-Ni, Zhuang LF, Zhang XM, Fan LF, Lai HC.
    PLoS One; 2018 Apr; 13(2):e0191717. PubMed ID: 29401469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study.
    Strauss FJ, Siegenthaler M, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I, Jung RE, Thoma DS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):745-756. PubMed ID: 35570366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biologic and Mechanical Stability of Screw-Retained Layered Zirconia Crowns Bonded to CAD/CAM Titanium Abutments Using Angulated Screw Access: A Prospective Closed Cohort Study.
    Norton MR.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Jul; 38(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 37099580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical Advantages of Angled Screw Access Channels for Implant-Supported Restorations in the Esthetic Zone.
    Berridge J, Patel N, Dimalanta W, Johnson T.
    Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex); 2021 Jul; (PB 8-21-10/11/12):18-21. PubMed ID: 34714917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.