These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 37659394

  • 1. Seven general radiography x-ray detectors with pixel sizes ranging from 175 to 76μm: technical evaluation with the focus on orthopaedic imaging.
    Marshall NW, Vandenbroucke D, Cockmartin L, Wanninger F, Smet M, Feng Y, Ni Y, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep 20; 68(19):. PubMed ID: 37659394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
    Van Peteghem N, Bosmans H, Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov 07; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
    Marshall NW, Smet M, Hofmans M, Pauwels H, De Clercq T, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov 21; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ, Tunstall CM, Kengyelics SK, Cowen AR, Davies AG.
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug 21; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
    Sheth NM, Uneri A, Helm PA, Zbijewski W, Siewerdsen JH.
    Med Phys; 2022 May 21; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW, Mackenzie A, Honey ID.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb 21; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
    Cao Q, Sisniega A, Brehler M, Stayman JW, Yorkston J, Siewerdsen JH, Zbijewski W.
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan 21; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
    Acciavatti RJ, Maidment ADA.
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb 21; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ, Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr 21; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC, Clemens JC, Hemmer C, Morel C.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar 21; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Development of a novel high quantum efficiency MV x-ray detector for image-guided radiotherapy: A feasibility study.
    Liu J, Xu Y, Teymurazyan A, Papandreou Z, Pang G.
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan 21; 47(1):152-163. PubMed ID: 31682020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec 21; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR, Aufrichtig R, Possin GE, Giambattista BW, Huang ZS, Liu J, Ma B.
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct 21; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.