These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 37672056

  • 21. Assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: value of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Amanuma M, Kondo T, Sano T, Takayanagi T, Matsutani H, Sekine T, Arai T, Morita H, Ishizaka K, Arakita K, Iwasa A, Takase S.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 26662268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study.
    Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Sonck J, Collet C, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Trabattoni D, Galli S, Montorsi P, Ferrari C, Fabbiocchi F, De Martini S, Annoni A, Mancini ME, Formenti A, Magatelli M, Resta M, Consiglio E, Muscogiuri G, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018 Apr; 12(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 29933938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of visibility of in-stent restenosis between conventional- and ultra-high spatial resolution computed tomography: coronary arterial phantom study.
    Nishii T, Funama Y, Kato S, Iwasawa T, Yasuda N, Ota Y, Kawagoe H, Oda S, Tsutsumi T, Utsunomiya D.
    Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 34586581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT in evaluating coronary stent patency: a comparison to invasive coronary angiography.
    Hagar MT, Soschynski M, Saffar R, Molina-Fuentes MF, Weiss J, Rau A, Schuppert C, Ruile P, Faby S, Schibilsky D, von Zur Muehlen C, Schlett CL, Bamberg F, Krauss T.
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4273-4283. PubMed ID: 38177617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The utility and effectiveness of the newer generation high-resolution coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis.
    Elwany MN, Abskharoun M, Dawood M, Al-Tahan SM, Sanhoury M.
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 49(2):102212. PubMed ID: 37993007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Feasibility and prognostic role of machine learning-based FFRCT in patients with stent implantation.
    Tang CX, Guo BJ, Schoepf JU, Bayer RR, Liu CY, Qiao HY, Zhou F, Lu GM, Zhou CS, Zhang LJ.
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6592-6604. PubMed ID: 33864504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation by CTA: Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction and Subtraction Technique.
    Xu C, Yi Y, Xu M, Yan J, Guo YB, Wang J, Wang Y, Li YM, Jin ZY, Wang YN.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 35946861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression.
    Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Collet C, Sonck J, D'Errico A, Di Odoardo L, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Trabattoni D, Ravagnani P, Montorsi P, Teruzzi G, Olivares P, Fabbiocchi F, De Martini S, Calligaris G, Annoni A, Mancini ME, Formenti A, Magatelli M, Consiglio E, Muscogiuri G, Lombardi F, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 13(3):732-742. PubMed ID: 31422127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Improved stent sharpness evaluation with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction in coronary CT angiography.
    Ryu JK, Kim KH, Otgonbaatar C, Kim DS, Shim H, Seo JW.
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Jun 18; 97(1159):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 38733576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population.
    Haraldsdottir S, Gudnason T, Sigurdsson AF, Gudjonsdottir J, Lehman SJ, Eyjolfsson K, Scheving SS, Gibson CM, Hoffmann U, Jonsdottir B, Andersen K.
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov 18; 76(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 19570632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Non-invasive computed tomography angiography in the assessment of coronary stent patency: an Australian experience.
    Soon KH, Cox N, Chaitowitz I, Selvanayagam JB, Farouque O, MacGregor L, Bell KW, Lim YL.
    Intern Med J; 2007 Jun 18; 37(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 17535378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1-year interval: findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Xu N, Zhang J, Li M, Pan J, Lu Z.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct 18; 83(10):1816-21. PubMed ID: 25112673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Malagutti P, Valgimigli M, Meijboom WB, Pugliese F, McFadden EP, Ligthart J, Runza G, Bruining N, Smits PC, Regar E, van der Giessen WJ, Sianos G, van Domburg R, de Jaegere P, Krestin GP, Serruys PW, de Feyter PJ.
    Circulation; 2006 Aug 15; 114(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 16894038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Clinical Evaluation of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
    Wang LF, Tao LW, Huang MX, Liao WB, Zhu YZ, Zhou WB, Li H, Li D, Lu HT, Zhang BZ, Chen Z.
    Echocardiography; 2015 Nov 15; 32(11):1681-7. PubMed ID: 25816917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.