These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 37676058

  • 1. Percutaneous ventricular assist device for higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in surgically ineligible patients: Indications and outcomes from the OPTIMUM study.
    Hirai T, Grantham JA, Kandzari DE, Ballard W, Brown WM, Allen KB, Kirtane AJ, Argenziano M, Yeh RW, Khabbaz K, Lombardi W, Lasala J, Kachroo P, Karmpaliotis D, Gosch KL, Salisbury AC, OPTIMUM Study Group.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(5):814-822. PubMed ID: 37676058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Outcomes of bailout percutaneous ventricular assist device versus prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention.
    O'Neill BP, Grines C, Moses JW, Ohman EM, Lansky A, Popma J, Kapur NK, Schreiber T, Mannino S, O'Neill WW, Medjamia AM, Mahmud E.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Oct; 98(4):E501-E512. PubMed ID: 34051033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Trends in the Outcomes of High-risk Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2018.
    Lemor A, Basir MB, Truesdell AG, Tamis-Holland JE, Alqarqaz M, Grines CL, Villablanca PA, Alaswad K, Pinto DS, O'Neill W.
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Oct 01; 156():65-71. PubMed ID: 34344515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diffusion of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in US Markets.
    Bjarnason TA, Mentias A, Panaich S, Vaughan Sarrazin M, Gao Y, Desai M, Pandey A, Dhruva SS, Desai NR, Girotra S.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Aug 01; 15(8):e011778. PubMed ID: 35904015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Use of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk cardiac interventions and cardiogenic shock.
    Thomas JL, Al-Ameri H, Economides C, Shareghi S, Abad DG, Mayeda G, Burstein S, Shavelle DM.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Aug 01; 22(8):360-4. PubMed ID: 20679671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiogenic Shock With Either a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device or an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump.
    Nakajima T, Tanaka Y, Fischer I, Kotkar K, Damiano RJ, Moon MR, Masood MF, Itoh A.
    ASAIO J; 2021 Jan 01; 67(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 33346989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Garan AR, Takeda K, Salna M, Vandenberge J, Doshi D, Karmpaliotis D, Kirtane AJ, Takayama H, Kurlansky P.
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May 07; 8(9):e012171. PubMed ID: 31041870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Cardiogenic Shock.
    Rios SA, Bravo CA, Weinreich M, Olmedo W, Villablanca P, Villela MA, Ramakrishna H, Hirji S, Robles OA, Mahato P, Gluud C, Bhatt DL, Jorde UP.
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Oct 15; 122(8):1330-1338. PubMed ID: 30146099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cost savings for pVAD compared to ECMO in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An episode-of-care analysis.
    Vetrovec GW, Lim MJ, Needham KA.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Oct 15; 98(4):703-710. PubMed ID: 32790231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization.
    Sukul D, Seth M, Dixon SR, Zainea M, Slocum NK, Pielsticker EJ, Gurm HS.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul 15; 90(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 27651035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Percutaneous cardiac assist devices compared with surgical hemodynamic support alternatives: cost-effectiveness in the emergent setting.
    Maini B, Gregory D, Scotti DJ, Buyantseva L.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May 01; 83(6):E183-92. PubMed ID: 24130115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous ventricular assist device implantation for cardiogenic shock.
    Berg DD, Sukul D, O'Brien M, Scirica BM, Sobieszczyk PS, Olenchock BA, Bohula EA, Morrow DA.
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2016 Apr 01; 5(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 25931573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.