These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 37709635

  • 1. Static friction, surface roughness, and antibacterial activity of orthodontic brackets coated with silver and silver chitosan nanoparticles.
    Tawakal MS, Abdelghany Metwally AM, El-Wassefy NA, Tawfik MA, Shamaa MS.
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Dec; 12(6):260-268. PubMed ID: 37709635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Antimicrobial effect, frictional resistance, and surface roughness of stainless steel orthodontic brackets coated with nanofilms of silver and titanium oxide: a preliminary study.
    Ghasemi T, Arash V, Rabiee SM, Rajabnia R, Pourzare A, Rakhshan V.
    Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Jun; 80(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 28181353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
    Bhat KRR, Ahmed N, Joseph R, Younus A A.
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro sliding-driven morphological changes in representative esthetic NiTi archwire surfaces.
    Choi S, Park DJ, Kim KA, Park KH, Park HK, Park YG.
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):926-34. PubMed ID: 26278620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J, Jones S.
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study.
    Shah P, Sharma P, Naik H, Patel K, Panchal C.
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 May; 15(5):e411-e419. PubMed ID: 37214744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.
    Choi SH, Kang DY, Hwang CJ.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 23767940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vitro assessment of stainless steel orthodontic brackets coated with titanium oxide mixed Ag for anti-adherent and antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis.
    Fatani EJ, Almutairi HH, Alharbi AO, Alnakhli YO, Divakar DD, Muzaheed, Alkheraif AA, Khan AA.
    Microb Pathog; 2017 Nov; 112():190-194. PubMed ID: 28966064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of Stainless-steel wires and brackets coated with nanoparticles of Chitosan or Zinc oxide upon friction: An in vitro study.
    Elhelbawy N, Ellaithy M.
    Int Orthod; 2021 Jun; 19(2):274-280. PubMed ID: 33610486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The antibacterial effect of silver, zinc-oxide and combination of silver/ zinc oxide nanoparticles coating of orthodontic brackets (an in vitro study).
    Zeidan NK, Enany NM, Mohamed GG, Marzouk ES.
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun 09; 22(1):230. PubMed ID: 35681128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of fine particle shot peening on surface friction of stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots.
    Tribumrungsuk P, Khantachawana A, Janyaprasert K.
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Oct 02; 41(5):682-687. PubMed ID: 35644570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ, Spiller RE, von Fraunhofer JA.
    Angle Orthod; 1995 Oct 02; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro comparison of frictional forces of a new polycrystalline ceramic bracket versus metal-insert ceramic bracket before and after aging.
    Dergham CA, Khoury E, Ghoubril J.
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun 02; 17(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30981676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials.
    Anhoury P, Nathanson D, Hughes CV, Socransky S, Feres M, Chou LL.
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug 02; 72(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 12169034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.
    Jones SP, Amoah KG.
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May 02; 23(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17679533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
    Guerrero AP, Guariza Filho O, Tanaka O, Camargo ES, Vieira S.
    Braz Oral Res; 2010 May 02; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R, Kwon HK, Close JM.
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May 02; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.