These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

97 related items for PubMed ID: 37728286

  • 1. Predicting speech-in-speech recognition: Short-term audibility and spatial separation.
    Wasiuk PA, Calandruccio L, Oleson JJ, Buss E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Sep 01; 154(3):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 37728286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Predicting speech-in-speech recognition: Short-term audibility, talker sex, and listener factors.
    Wasiuk PA, Buss E, Oleson JJ, Calandruccio L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Nov 01; 152(5):3010. PubMed ID: 36456289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E, Calandruccio L, Oleson J, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov 01; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Nov 01; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G, Corbin NE, Leibold LJ, Buss E.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr 01; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD, Corbin NE, Buss E, Monson BB.
    Ear Hear; 2022 Apr 01; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J, Shi Y, Kong Y, Chen B, Zhang L, Galvin JJ, Li Y, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2022 Apr 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V, Lang-Roth R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug 09; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
    Buss E, Leibold LJ, Porter HL, Grose JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr 09; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M, McLean HH, McCreery R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct 09; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.
    Rosen S, Souza P, Ekelund C, Majeed AA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr 09; 133(4):2431-43. PubMed ID: 23556608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr 09; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.
    Calcus A, Schoof T, Rosen S, Shinn-Cunningham B, Souza P.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Apr 09; 41(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 31107365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep 09; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb 09; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Binaural Glimpses at the Cocktail Party?
    Lingner A, Grothe B, Wiegrebe L, Ewert SD.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct 09; 17(5):461-73. PubMed ID: 27412529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?
    Jett B, Buss E, Best V, Oleson J, Calandruccio L.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr 14; 64(4):1390-1403. PubMed ID: 33784185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J, Wang X, Wang NY, Fu X, Gan T, Galvin JJ, Willis S, Xu K, Thomas M, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug 10; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug 10; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 10; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.