These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


166 related items for PubMed ID: 37733968

  • 1. Factors Affecting Performance in Adults With Cochlear Implants: A Role for Cognition and Residual Cochlear Function.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Durakovic N, Wick CC, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec 01; 44(10):988-996. PubMed ID: 37733968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improved Cochlear Implant Performance Estimation Using Tonotopic-Based Electrocochleography.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Varghese J, Ioerger P, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec 01; 149(12):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 37856099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Kallogjeri D, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb 23; 12(1):3083. PubMed ID: 35197556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.
    Canfarotta MW, O'Connell BP, Giardina CK, Buss E, Brown KD, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA, Adunka OF, Fitzpatrick DC.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Feb 23; 42(4):941-948. PubMed ID: 33369942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: II. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Speech-Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Varghese J, Lefler SM, Bhat A, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Feb 23; 45(6):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 38880958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Promontory Electrocochleography Recordings to Predict Speech-Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Lee DS, Lefler SM, Kallogjeri D, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Fitzpatrick DC, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep 01; 43(8):915-923. PubMed ID: 35861658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
    Buchman CA, Herzog JA, McJunkin JL, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Firszt JB, Kallogjeri D, CI532 Study Group.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct 01; 146(10):916-924. PubMed ID: 32857113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Panario J, Bester C, O'Leary S.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Oct 01; 45(5):1173-1190. PubMed ID: 38816899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos-Macias A, O'Leary S, Ramos-deMiguel A, Bester C, Falcon-González JC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun 01; 40(5S Suppl 1):S29-S37. PubMed ID: 31225820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Early Hearing Preservation Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation With New Slim Lateral Wall Electrode Using Electrocochleography.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Ettyreddy A, Lefler SM, Jiramongkolchai P, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Buchman CA, Herzog JA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr 01; 43(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 35170555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Impact of Age on Noise Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Shew MA, Herzog JA, Kallogjeri D, Chen S, Wick C, Durakovic N, McJunkin J, Buchman CA, CI532 Study Group.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan 01; 43(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 34889840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Valenzuela CV, Lichtenhan JT, Lefler SM, Koka K, Buchman CA, Ortmann AJ.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct 01; 131(10):E2681-E2688. PubMed ID: 34019310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Espahbodi M, Harvey E, Livingston AJ, Montagne W, Kozlowski K, Jensen J, Liu X, Juan W, Tarima S, Rusch M, Harris MS.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep 01; 43(8):e888-e894. PubMed ID: 35970167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech perception performance as a function of age at implantation among postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Mahmoud AF, Ruckenstein MJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec 01; 35(10):e286-91. PubMed ID: 25226375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.