These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 377744

  • 1. [Diagnosis of urinary tract infections in general practice. A comparative study of Microstix and Uricult].
    Kjaerulff E, Dybkjaer L, Granlie K, Magnusson B.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1979 May 28; 141(22):1477-80. PubMed ID: 377744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of a screening (Microstix) for urinary tract infections.
    Litvak AS, Eadie EB, McRoberts JW.
    South Med J; 1976 Nov 28; 69(11):1418-9. PubMed ID: 798290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Risk of overdiagnosis of urine cultures].
    Pettersson L, Kinnunen K, Forsum U.
    Lakartidningen; 1995 May 24; 92(21):2195-6. PubMed ID: 7776755
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Value of bacterioscopic examination of the urine for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections].
    Murahovschi J, Trabulsi LR, Nogueira PC, Vivi V.
    Rev Paul Med; 1988 May 24; 106(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 3077529
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparative studies on the value of Uricult-procedure in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections].
    Fuchs T, Gutensohn G.
    Med Welt; 1971 May 01; 18():735-40. PubMed ID: 4930814
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of laboratory methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.
    Duerden BI, Moyes A.
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Apr 01; 29(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 777041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Significance of sampling methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections, particularly in general practice].
    Uhari M, Vierimaa E, Siivola J, Tarkka M, Ervasti J, Heinonen M.
    Duodecim; 1976 Apr 01; 92(9):484-9. PubMed ID: 776585
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Urine microscopy and culture.
    Nair BR.
    N Z Med J; 1988 Mar 23; 101(842):150. PubMed ID: 3353037
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Statistical evaluation of bacteriological diagnosis of urinary tract infections in children treated in a general hospital].
    Narbutowicz B, Kostrzewska K, Tomaszewska Z.
    Pediatr Pol; 1975 Aug 23; 50(8):971-9. PubMed ID: 1161358
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.