These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 37791429

  • 1. Role of the medial olivocochlear efferent auditory system in speech perception in noise: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Gafoor SA, Uppunda AK.
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Aug; 63(8):561-569. PubMed ID: 37791429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech Perception in Noise and Medial Olivocochlear Reflex: Effects of Age, Speech Stimulus, and Response-Related Variables.
    Gafoor SA, Uppunda AK.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 24(6):619-631. PubMed ID: 38079021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Mertes IB, Wilbanks EC, Leek MR.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Dec; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.
    Kumar UA, Vanaja CS.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W, Frey K, Heppelmann G, Plontke SK, Zenner HP.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P.
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan 03; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech-in-noise perception ability can be related to auditory efferent pathway function: a comparative study in reading impaired and normal reading children.
    Akbari M, Panahi R, Valadbeigi A, Hamadi Nahrani M.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan 03; 86(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 30772249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise.
    Mishra SK, Lutman ME.
    PLoS One; 2014 Jan 03; 9(1):e85756. PubMed ID: 24465686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Giraud AL, Garnier S, Micheyl C, Lina G, Chays A, Chéry-Croze S.
    Neuroreport; 1997 May 06; 8(7):1779-83. PubMed ID: 9189932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
    Stuart A, Butler AK.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct 06; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z, Filipović D, Milosević D.
    Med Pregl; 2003 Oct 06; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Adversarial relationship between combined medial olivocochlear (MOC) and middle-ear-muscle (MEM) reflexes and alarm-in-noise detection thresholds under negative signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
    Karunarathne B, Wang T, So RHY, Kam ACS, Meddis R.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep 06; 367():124-128. PubMed ID: 30107299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aging of the medial olivocochlear reflex and associations with speech perception.
    Abdala C, Dhar S, Ahmadi M, Luo P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb 06; 135(2):754-65. PubMed ID: 25234884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The medial olivocochlear reflex in children during active listening.
    Smith SB, Cone B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug 06; 54(8):518-23. PubMed ID: 25735203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA, Brookes GB, Prasher DK.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar 06; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
    Bidelman GM, Bhagat SP.
    Neuroreport; 2015 May 27; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
    Bulut E, Öztürk G, Taş M, Türkmen MT, Gülmez ZD, Öztürk L.
    Physiol Int; 2019 Jun 01; 106(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 31262207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Medial olivocochlear function in children with poor speech-in-noise performance and language disorder.
    Rocha-Muniz CN, Mamede Carvallo RM, Schochat E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May 01; 96():116-121. PubMed ID: 28390599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
    Yashaswini L, Maruthy S.
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug 28; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar 28; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.