These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 37792149
21. Artificial Intelligence for Anesthesiology Board-Style Examination Questions: Role of Large Language Models. Khan AA, Yunus R, Sohail M, Rehman TA, Saeed S, Bu Y, Jackson CD, Sharkey A, Mahmood F, Matyal R. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 May; 38(5):1251-1259. PubMed ID: 38423884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the accuracy and completeness of artificial intelligence language models in providing information on methotrexate use. Coskun BN, Yagiz B, Ocakoglu G, Dalkilic E, Pehlivan Y. Rheumatol Int; 2024 Mar; 44(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 37747564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing the performance of ChatGPT GPT-4, Bard, and Llama-2 in the Taiwan Psychiatric Licensing Examination and in differential diagnosis with multi-center psychiatrists. Li DJ, Kao YC, Tsai SJ, Bai YM, Yeh TC, Chu CS, Hsu CW, Cheng SW, Hsu TW, Liang CS, Su KP. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 78(6):347-352. PubMed ID: 38404249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing. Kumari A, Kumari A, Singh A, Singh SK, Juhi A, Dhanvijay AKD, Pinjar MJ, Mondal H. Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. GPT-4 Turbo with Vision fails to outperform text-only GPT-4 Turbo in the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination. Hirano Y, Hanaoka S, Nakao T, Miki S, Kikuchi T, Nakamura Y, Nomura Y, Yoshikawa T, Abe O. Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Aug; 42(8):918-926. PubMed ID: 38733472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard Performances at the Advanced Burn Life Support Exam. Alessandri-Bonetti M, Liu HY, Donovan JM, Ziembicki JA, Egro FM. J Burn Care Res; 2024 Aug 06; 45(4):945-948. PubMed ID: 38833383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis. Chelli M, Descamps J, Lavoué V, Trojani C, Azar M, Deckert M, Raynier JL, Clowez G, Boileau P, Ruetsch-Chelli C. J Med Internet Res; 2024 May 22; 26():e53164. PubMed ID: 38776130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the Accuracy of AI Models in Orthodontic Knowledge: A Comparative Study Between ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard. Naureen S, Kiani HG. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2024 Jul 22; 34(7):761-766. PubMed ID: 38978236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI. Mediboina A, Badam RK, Chodavarapu S. Cureus; 2024 Jan 22; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology. Dhanvijay AKD, Pinjar MJ, Dhokane N, Sorte SR, Kumari A, Mondal H. Cureus; 2023 Aug 22; 15(8):e42972. PubMed ID: 37671207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability and readability analysis of ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard as a patient information source for the most commonly applied radionuclide treatments in cancer patients. Şan H, Bayrakcı Ö, Çağdaş B, Serdengeçti M, Alagöz E. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2024 Aug 22; 43(4):500021. PubMed ID: 38821410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing generative and retrieval-based chatbots in answering patient questions regarding age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. Cheong KX, Zhang C, Tan TE, Fenner BJ, Wong WM, Teo KY, Wang YX, Sivaprasad S, Keane PA, Lee CS, Lee AY, Cheung CMG, Wong TY, Cheong YG, Song SJ, Tham YC. Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep 20; 108(10):1443-1449. PubMed ID: 38749531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]