These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 37811576

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions.
    Civak T, Ustun T, Yilmaz HN, Gursoy B.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Jan; 49(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 33298388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tissue changes and tissue reactivity following osteotomy by a conventional rotary device, an ultrasonic unit, and an Er: YAG laser - A comparative study in humans.
    Blagova B, Krastev D, Krastev N, Malinova L.
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct; 125(5):101750. PubMed ID: 38142938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A Clinical Comparison of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Conventional Bur Methods in the Impacted Third Molar Surgery.
    Genç BGÇ, Orhan K, Or S.
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2023 Jun; 41(6):283-290. PubMed ID: 37335617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Three-dimensional evaluation of the effect of low-level laser therapy on facial swelling after lower third molar surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
    Asutay F, Ozcan-Kucuk A, Alan H, Koparal M.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1107-1113. PubMed ID: 30156193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Conventional Rotary Technique and Piezosurgical Technique in the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Comparative Study.
    Hamza SP, Aslam S, Roshni A, Cherian MP, Soman S, Akhila K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Feb 01; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 37272140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Ma Z, Xu G, Yang C, Xie Q, Shen Y, Zhang S.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr 01; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nd:YAG laser therapy on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized double-blinded clinical study.
    Han Y, Zhu J, Hu S, Li C, Zhang X.
    Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Aug 05; 38(1):176. PubMed ID: 37541966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct 05; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study.
    Gulnahar Y, Alpan AL.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 May 01; 26(3):e269-e275. PubMed ID: 33772570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sublingual ketorolac and sublingual piroxicam are equally effective for postoperative pain, trismus, and swelling management in lower third molar removal.
    Trindade PA, Giglio FP, Colombini-Ishikiriama BL, Calvo AM, Modena KC, Ribeiro DA, Dionísio TJ, Brozoski DT, Lauris JR, Faria FA, Santos CF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul 01; 114(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22732846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Modified lingual split technique versus conventional buccal technique in odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Hindy AM, Ismaiel ME, Fayed N.
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr 01; 41(2):1137-44. PubMed ID: 9497650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery.
    Sortino F, Pedullà E, Masoli V.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec 01; 66(12):2444-8. PubMed ID: 19022121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.