These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 37821098

  • 1. Optimal cervical-ripening method for labor induction in Japan after the era of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Furuya N, Hasegawa J, Saji S, Homma C, Nishimura Y, Suzuki N.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Jan; 50(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 37821098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N, Manor Y, Wiznitzer A, Hod M, Yogev Y.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of epidural analgesia on cervical ripening using dinoprostone vaginal inserts.
    Hasegawa J, Homma C, Saji S, Furuya N, Sakamoto M.
    J Anesth; 2024 Apr; 38(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 38300361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Second dose of PGE2 vaginal insert versus Foley transcervical balloon for induction of labor after failure of cervical ripening with PGE2 vaginal insert.
    Mohr-Sasson A, Schiff E, Sindel O, Suday RR, Kalter-Farber A, Mashiach R, Yinon Y, Dulitzki M, Sivan E, Mazaki-Tovi S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2074-2077. PubMed ID: 27633399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I, Gaudier FL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: A prospective cohort study.
    Daykan Y, Biron-Shental T, Navve D, Miller N, Bustan M, Sukenik-Halevy R.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29978599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.
    Koenigbauer JT, Schalinski E, Jarchau U, Gauger U, Brandt K, Klaucke S, Scharf JP, Rath W, Hellmeyer L.
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep 27; 49(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 34333894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour.
    Lyrenäs S, Clason I, Ulmsten U.
    BJOG; 2001 Feb 27; 108(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 11236117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
    Yamaguchi M, Takakura S, Enomoto N, Teishikata Y, Kitamura A, Maki S, Tanaka K, Maezawa T, Tanaka H, Ikeda T.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Dec 27; 47(12):4256-4262. PubMed ID: 34545652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.