These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 37839924

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Tissue processing of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Notohara K, Nakamura K.
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2024 Apr; 51(2):261-274. PubMed ID: 38051462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in pretest prediction and diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma].
    Wu L, Guo W, Li Y, Cheng T, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Liu B, Zhong M, Li S, Deng X, Zhu W.
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2018 Sep 30; 38(10):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30377133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P, Demir A, Khodakaram K, Nilsson O, Sadik R.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb 30; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, Parisi A, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Parcesepe P, Scarpa A, Manfrin E.
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar 30; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug 30; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Anaplastic (undifferentiated) carcinoma of pancreas, an uncommon variant: Diagnosed on endoscopic-guided fine needle aspiration.
    Osama MA, Bakshi P, Verma K.
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2023 Aug 30; 66(3):648-651. PubMed ID: 37530362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
    Caymaz I, Afandiyeva N.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Nov 30; 46(11):1596-1602. PubMed ID: 37464106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Kudo T, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Inoue H, Katanuma A, Kawakubo K, Ishiwatari H, Doi S, Yamada R, Maguchi H, Isayama H, Mitsuhashi T, Sakamoto N, Japan EUS-FNA Negative Pressure Suction Study Group.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec 30; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma.
    Suzuki R, Irie H, Takagi T, Sugimoto M, Konno N, Sato Y, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Marubashi S, Hikichi T, Ohira H.
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Oct 12; 18(1):974. PubMed ID: 30314433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M, Abusinna E, Tahoun N, Okasha HH, El-Habashi AH.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun 01; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Percutaneous ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: An analysis of 1074 lesions.
    Chai WL, Kuang XF, Yu L, Cheng C, Jin XY, Zhao QY, Jiang TA.
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2023 Jun 01; 22(3):302-309. PubMed ID: 35817668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The diagnostic utility of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase immunohistochemistry for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in FNA and small biopsy specimens.
    Yu S, Doyle LA, Hornick JL, Mito JK.
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 Feb 01; 132(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 38054349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.
    Trisolini E, Armellini E, Paganotti A, Veggiani C, Bozzola C, Frattini M, Pizio C, Mancuso G, Andorno S, Boldorini R.
    Pathology; 2017 Jun 01; 49(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 28450086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.