These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 37942394

  • 1. How Efficient Is ChatGPT in Accessing Accurate and Quality Health-Related Information?
    Ulusoy I, Yılmaz M, Kıvrak A.
    Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46662. PubMed ID: 37942394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. AI-Generated Information for Vascular Patients: Assessing the Standard of Procedure-Specific Information Provided by the ChatGPT AI-Language Model.
    Haidar O, Jaques A, McCaughran PW, Metcalfe MJ.
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49764. PubMed ID: 38046759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information.
    Berry CE, Fazilat AZ, Lavin C, Lintel H, Cole N, Stingl CS, Valencia C, Morgan AG, Momeni A, Wan DC.
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2024 Nov; 40(9):657-664. PubMed ID: 38382637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy.
    Onder CE, Koc G, Gokbulut P, Taskaldiran I, Kuskonmaz SM.
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan 02; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.
    Gibson D, Jackson S, Shanmugasundaram R, Seth I, Siu A, Ahmadi N, Kam J, Mehan N, Thanigasalam R, Jeffery N, Patel MI, Leslie S.
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug 14; 26():e55939. PubMed ID: 39141904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluating ChatGPT-4's performance as a digital health advisor for otosclerosis surgery.
    Sahin S, Erkmen B, Duymaz YK, Bayram F, Tekin AM, Topsakal V.
    Front Surg; 2024 Aug 14; 11():1373843. PubMed ID: 38903865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The quality and readability of patient information provided by ChatGPT: can AI reliably explain common ENT operations?
    Abou-Abdallah M, Dar T, Mahmudzade Y, Michaels J, Talwar R, Tornari C.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Nov 14; 281(11):6147-6153. PubMed ID: 38530460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM, Kelly M, Selvarajah L, Murray M, Scanlon T.
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May 05; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessment of Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
    Fahy S, Oehme S, Milinkovic D, Jung T, Bartek B.
    J Pers Med; 2024 Jan 18; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is ChatGPT a Reliable Source of Patient Information on Asthma?
    Alabdulmohsen DM, Almahmudi MA, Alhashim JN, Almahdi MH, Alkishy EF, Almossabeh MJ, Alkhalifah SA.
    Cureus; 2024 Jul 18; 16(7):e64114. PubMed ID: 39119408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Can ChatGPT answer patient questions regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
    Lack BT, Mouhawasse E, Childers JT, Jackson GR, Daji SV, Yerke-Hansen P, Familiari F, Knapik DM, Sabesan VJ.
    J ISAKOS; 2024 Dec 18; 9(6):100323. PubMed ID: 39307189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R, Mahajan J, Oydanich M, Khouri AS.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023 Dec 18; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
    Nangia D, Saini A, Krishnan A, Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Logani A.
    Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug 18; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
    Kaya E, Görmez S.
    Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov 18; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
    Ozduran E, Büyükçoban S.
    PeerJ; 2022 Nov 18; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.