These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 37944667

  • 1. Predictive ability of fetal growth charts in identifying kindergarten-age developmental challenges: a cohort study.
    Fernandez A, Liauw J, Mayer C, Albert A, Hutcheon JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jan; 6(1):101220. PubMed ID: 37944667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL, Reddy UM, Chen Z, Grobman WA, Wapner RJ, Steller JG, Simhan H, Scifres CM, Blue N, Parry S, Grantz KL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 231(3):338.e1-338.e18. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
    Leon-Martinez D, Lundsberg LS, Culhane J, Zhang J, Son M, Reddy UM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
    Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Chao CR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Which chart and which cut-point: deciding on the INTERGROWTH, World Health Organization, or Hadlock fetal growth chart.
    Liauw J, Mayer C, Albert A, Fernandez A, Hutcheon JA.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jan 10; 22(1):25. PubMed ID: 35012473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
    Cheng Y, Leung TY, Lao T, Chan YM, Sahota DS.
    BJOG; 2016 Sep 10; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction.
    Mascherpa M, Pegoire C, Meroni A, Minopoli M, Thilaganathan B, Frick A, Bhide A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May 10; 63(5):605-612. PubMed ID: 38145554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter?
    Mylrea-Foley B, Napolitano R, Gordijn S, Wolf H, Lees CC, Stampalija T, TRUFFLE-2 Feasibility Study Authors.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov 10; 5(11):101117. PubMed ID: 37544409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The satisfactory growth and development at 2 years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards.
    Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Staines Urias E, Giuliani F, Ohuma EO, Victora CG, Papageorghiou AT, Altman DG, Garza C, Barros FC, Puglia F, Ochieng R, Jaffer YA, Noble JA, Bertino E, Purwar M, Pang R, Lambert A, Chumlea C, Stein A, Fernandes M, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21(st) Century (INTERGROWTH-21(st)).
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 10; 218(2S):S841-S854.e2. PubMed ID: 29273309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D, Romero R, Gudicha DW, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pacora P, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Tirosh D, Yeo L, Erez O, Hassan SS, Tarca AL.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb 10; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I, Ego A, Benachi A, Hocquette A, Blondel B, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J.
    BJOG; 2022 May 10; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
    Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, Buck Louis GM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 10; 218(2S):S641-S655.e28. PubMed ID: 29275821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.
    Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G, Platt LD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 10; 218(2S):S619-S629. PubMed ID: 29422204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
    Monier I, Ego A, Benachi A, Hocquette A, Blondel B, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan 10; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dichorionic twin-specific vs singleton growth references for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction.
    Shea SK, Likins BJ, Boan AD, Newman RB, Finneran MM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun 10; 224(6):603.e1-603.e9. PubMed ID: 33771495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
    Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, Leavitt K, Tuuli M, Odibo AO.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun 10; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The impact of different growth charts on birthweight prediction: obstetrical ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging.
    Badr DA, Cannie MM, Kadji C, Kang X, Carlin A, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Oct 10; 5(10):101123. PubMed ID: 37574047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun 10; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY, Gordon A, Hilder L, Henry A, Hyett JA, Brew BK, Joseph F, Jorm L, Chambers GM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug 10; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.