These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
107 related items for PubMed ID: 3795391
1. A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction. Fogle MA, Whittemore AD, Couch NP, Mannick JA. J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jan; 5(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 3795391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts. Neale ML, Graham JC, Lane RJ, Cheung DS, Appleberg M. J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In situ saphenous vein arterial bypass for infrainguinal revascularization: initial experience using an open technique. de Mello AV, Santos CM, Silva JL, Souza MT, Portilho MA, Guimarães AV, Freitas RG, Silvério JW. Int Angiol; 1991 Feb; 10(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 1765713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of in-situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrageniculate bypass. Ricci MA, Graham AM, Symes JF. Can J Surg; 1990 Jun; 33(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 2350745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of reversed and in situ saphenous vein grafts for infragenicular bypass: experience of two surgeons. Sasajima T, Kubo Y, Kokubo M, Izumi Y, Inaba M. Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 1(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8075994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Composite sequential grafts in severe ischemia: a comparative study. Flinn WR, Ricco JB, Yao JS, McDaniel MD, King TA, Bergan JJ. J Vasc Surg; 1984 May; 1(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 6481895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: a comparison of outcome and hemodynamic results. Schneider JR, Walsh DB, McDaniel MD, Zwolak RM, Besso SR, Cronenwett JL. J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jun; 17(6):1029-38; discussion 1038-40. PubMed ID: 8505781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases. Pomposelli FB, Kansal N, Hamdan AD, Belfield A, Sheahan M, Campbell DR, Skillman JJ, Logerfo FW. J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 12563200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Revascularization of the lower limb through arterial bypass with "in-situ" saphenous vein. Pizarro IE, Ibañez F, Salas S, Cam A. Int Angiol; 1991 Feb; 10(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 2071974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses]. Marković DM, Davidović LB, Lotina SI, Kostić DM, Cinara IS, Svetković SD, Marković M, Zivanović N. Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999 Feb; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of composite grafts in femorocrural bypasses performed for limb salvage: a review of 108 consecutive cases and comparison with 57 in situ saphenous vein bypasses. Feinberg RL, Winter RP, Wheeler JR, Gregory RT, Snyder SO, Gayle RG, Parent FN, Adcock GD. J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 2398584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Infrapopliteal bypass for severe ischemia: comparison of autogenous vein, composite, and prosthetic grafts. Londrey GL, Ramsey DE, Hodgson KJ, Barkmeier LD, Sumner DS. J Vasc Surg; 1991 May; 13(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 2027201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Distal bypass with the saphenous vein in situ. Technical aspects and early results. Qvarfordt P, Ribbe E, Thörne J. Int Angiol; 1988 May; 7(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3290357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]