These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 37957064

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow.
    Kim SJ, Kang YJ, Kim JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov 11. PubMed ID: 37957064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Strommer S, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 11. PubMed ID: 38609764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans.
    Inoue N, Scialabba R, Lee JD, Lee SJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 11; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study.
    Lin H, Pan Y, Wei X, Wang Y, Yu H, Cheng H.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul 11; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 18. PubMed ID: 38641478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records.
    Li J, Chen Z, Decker AM, Wang HL, Joda T, Mendonca G, Lepidi L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan 18; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.
    Thompson GA, Nick C, Francisco P, Lux L, Wiens JP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct 18; 128(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 33736862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH, Thompson GA, Waliszewski KJ, Ziebert GJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep 18; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans.
    Yang S, Dong B, Zhang Q, Li J, Yuan Q, Yue L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec 18; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Comparison of three-dimensional position of maxillary dentition model treated with two digital transfer methods].
    Peng TW, Ma T, Yang ZK, Zhang MD, Ren GH.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jan 09; 59(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 38172065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E, Fornai C, Weber GW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb 09; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Kois JC.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Dec 09; 36(12):1675-1686. PubMed ID: 38778662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of accuracy in digital and conventional cross-mounting.
    Luu D, Kan E, Kim SW, Lee JD, Lee SJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct 09; 132(4):784-791. PubMed ID: 36473749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intraoral scanner-based virtual facebow transferring: A chairside dental technique.
    Yang S, Wu L, Alabkaa B, Lepidi L, Yue L, Li J.
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul 10. PubMed ID: 38985098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of the influence of the facial scanning method on the transfer accuracy of a maxillary digital scan to a 3D face scan for a virtual facebow technique: An in vitro study.
    Amezua X, Iturrate M, Garikano X, Solaberrieta E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 10; 128(5):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 33722381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique.
    Kim JE, Kim SJ, Kwon DH, Shim JS, Kim JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan 10; 125(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 32033790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator.
    Park JH, Lee GH, Moon DN, Kim JC, Park M, Lee KM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun 10; 125(6):849-853. PubMed ID: 32624222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study.
    Shetty S, Shenoy KK, Sabu A.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016 Jun 10; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M, Ding Q, Li L, Yang G, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Zhang L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr 10; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L, Chen L, Harris BT, Bhandari B, Morton D, Lin WS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep 10; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.