These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


198 related items for PubMed ID: 37987634

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery.
    Miura T, Sakamoto Y, Morohashi H, Suto A, Kubota S, Ichisawa A, Kuwata D, Yamada T, Tamba H, Matsumoto S, Hakamada K.
    BMC Surg; 2022 Apr 21; 22(1):147. PubMed ID: 35449005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.
    Seow W, Dudi-Venkata NN, Bedrikovetski S, Kroon HM, Sammour T.
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 May 21; 27(5):345-360. PubMed ID: 36508067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
    2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating groupEuropean Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Cohort Studies Committee, Department of Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark..
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Sep 21; 20 Suppl 6():33-46. PubMed ID: 30255642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A Prospective European Trial Comparing Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, Robotic-Assisted, and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Procedures in High-Risk Patients with Rectal Cancer: The RESET Trial.
    Rouanet P, Guerrieri M, Lemercier P, Balik E, Cotte E, Spinelli A, Gómez-Ruiz M, Wolthuis A, Bertani E, Dubois A, on behalf the RESET study group.
    Ann Surg; 2024 Sep 12. PubMed ID: 39263755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparative study of functional prognosis of transanal total mesorectal excision and conventional total mesorectal excision based on propensity score matching].
    Zhu LY, Zhao SD, Shen ZL, Ye YJ, Yin MJ, Yang XD, Xie QW, Jiang KW, Liang B, Wang S.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug 01; 58(8):619-625. PubMed ID: 32727194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.
    Law WL, Foo DCC.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar 01; 33(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 30014329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
    Sun R, Cong L, Qiu HZ, Lin GL, Wu B, Niu BZ, Sun XY, Zhou JL, Xu L, Lu JY, Xiao Y.
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun 25; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.
    de'Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Martínez-Pérez A, Biondi A, Pucciarelli S, Schena CA, Pellino G, Kraft M, van Lieshout AS, Morelli L, Valverde A, Lupinacci RM, Gómez-Abril SA, Persiani R, Tuynman JB, Espin-Basany E, Ris F, European MRI and Rectal Cancer Surgery (EuMaRCS) Study Group .
    BJS Open; 2024 May 08; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38805357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision].
    Dou R, Sun W, Luo S, Hou Y, Zhang C, Kang L.
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar 25; 22(3):246-254. PubMed ID: 30919377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients.
    Mege D, Hain E, Lakkis Z, Maggiori L, Prost À la Denise J, Panis Y.
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jun 25; 20(6):O143-O151. PubMed ID: 29693307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Roodbeen SX, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Kusters M, Slater A, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Cunningham C, Hompes R.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug 25; 33(8):2459-2467. PubMed ID: 30350103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision and robotic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Shin JK, Kim HC, Yun SH, Park YA, Cho YB, Huh JW, Lee WY.
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec 25; 35(12):6998-7004. PubMed ID: 33523275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Short- and long-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-to-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang X, Gao Y, Dai X, Zhang H, Shang Z, Cai X, Shen T, Cheng X, Yu K, Li Y.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar 25; 33(3):972-985. PubMed ID: 30374790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Li Z, Wang Q, Ning W, Yang Q, Huang Y, Yan S, Yang B, Xie M.
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep 25; 37(9):6852-6860. PubMed ID: 37308763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.