These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
127 related items for PubMed ID: 38018396
1. Considerations for predictable outcomes in static computer- aided implant surgery in the esthetic zone. Markovic J, Peña-Cardelles JF, Pedrinaci I, Hamilton A, Gallucci GO, Lanis A. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):207-219. PubMed ID: 38018396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes. Chackartchi T, Romanos GE, Parkanyi L, Schwarz F, Sculean A. Periodontol 2000; 2022 Feb; 88(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 35103317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning. Pérez-Giugovaz MG, Sadeghpour M, Revilla-León M. J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):384-390. PubMed ID: 34315612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS, Joda T, Thieringer FM. J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trial. Ngamprasertkit C, Aunmeungthong W, Khongkhunthian P. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 34164754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C, Sánchez-Garcés MA, Jorba-García A. J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted bone augmentation, implant planning and placement: An in vitro investigation. Unger S, Benic GI, Ender A, Pasic P, Hämmerle CHF, Stadlinger B. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):719-726. PubMed ID: 37248956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Esthetics of Flapless Single-Tooth Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Using Guided Surgery: Association of Three-Dimensional Accuracy and Pink Esthetic Score. Fürhauser R, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Busenlechner D, Watzek G, Pommer B. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e427-33. PubMed ID: 25346154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Considerations in the replacement of over-retained primary teeth with implant restorations in the esthetic zone: A case report. Jang JY, Lee SJ, Lee JD. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Apr; 32(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 31999053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of partially and fully guided surgical techniques for immediate implant placement: An in vitro assessment. Nicchio N, Gonçalves V, Mendonça G, Sales E Pessoa R, Frizzera F, Zandim-Barcelos DL. J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):363.e1-363.e7. PubMed ID: 36577570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and patient-centered results of marker-based and marker-free registrations for dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Zhu J, Sun W, Li L, Li H, Zou Y, Huang B, Ji W, Shi B. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 37955359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]