These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
127 related items for PubMed ID: 38018396
21. Effect of flapless surgery on single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. Bashutski JD, Wang HL, Rudek I, Moreno I, Koticha T, Oh TJ. J Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1747-54. PubMed ID: 23347348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report. Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, Choi BH. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2541-2549. PubMed ID: 28881181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: More Efficiency in Guided Surgery. Alevizakos V, Mitov G, von See C. J Oral Implantol; 2022 Dec 01; 48(6):480-484. PubMed ID: 34965289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Placement accuracy and primary stability of implants in the esthetic zone using dynamic and static computer-assisted navigation: A retrospective case-control study. Liu Q, Liu Y, Chen D, Wu X, Huang R, Liu R, Chen Z, Chen Z. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar 01; 131(3):427-435. PubMed ID: 36473750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Bergé SJ, Xi T, Maal TJJ. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr 01; 46(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27887876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Analyzing Linear and Angular Deviations After Guided Surgery for Dental Implant Placement: A Preliminary Study. Fonseca CM, da Fonseca PAB, Quezada MM, Marques T, Montero J, Morton D, Correia A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Oct 16; 39(5):738-744. PubMed ID: 38394442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis. Guentsch A, An H, Dentino AR. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Apr 16; 33(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 35148444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. González Rueda JR, Galparsoro Catalán A, de Paz Hermoso VM, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Pato Mourelo J, Montero Martín J, Hernández Montero S. BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar 15; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct 15; 66(1):214-27. PubMed ID: 25123770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report. Stapleton BM, Lin WS, Ntounis A, Harris BT, Morton D. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 15; 112(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 24831749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Complete-Arch Implant Rehabilitation with the Aid of Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery and Transitional Implants: A New Digital Approach. Doliveux S, Jamjoom FZ, Albahri R, Rousson DD, Hamilton A, El Kholy K. Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep 15; 36(1):74–80. PubMed ID: 36165883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb 15; 73(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28000275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study. Schnutenhaus S, Gröller S, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug 15; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique. Tan PLB, Layton DM, Wise SL. Int J Comput Dent; 2018 Aug 15; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. Block MS, Emery RW. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb 15; 74(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 26452429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Presentation of two cases of immediate restoration of implants in the esthetic region, using facilitate software and guides with stereolithographic model surgery prior to patient surgery. Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Madianos P. J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb 15; 21(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22050241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery. Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, Emery R. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov 15; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital planning for two-implant-supported overdenture and bone reduction guide using cone-beam computed tomography: Simple features for predictable outcomes. Meneghetti PC, Sabri H, Dastouri E, Pereira RMA, Teixeira W, Wang HL, Mendonça G. J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr 15; 32(4):361-370. PubMed ID: 36752037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The smiling scan technique: Facially driven guided surgery and prosthetics. Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Moy PK. J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct 15; 62(4):514-517. PubMed ID: 29655527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery With Different Fields of View of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography. Lee HC, Chiou LL, Yang CC, Lin WS, Dutra V, Hamada Y. J Oral Implantol; 2024 Apr 01; 50(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 38400736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]