These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment. Gibson D, Jackson S, Shanmugasundaram R, Seth I, Siu A, Ahmadi N, Kam J, Mehan N, Thanigasalam R, Jeffery N, Patel MI, Leslie S. J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug 14; 26():e55939. PubMed ID: 39141904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality and readability of patient information provided by ChatGPT: can AI reliably explain common ENT operations? Abou-Abdallah M, Dar T, Mahmudzade Y, Michaels J, Talwar R, Tornari C. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Nov 14; 281(11):6147-6153. PubMed ID: 38530460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Cardiac Catheterization From Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Behers BJ, Vargas IA, Behers BM, Rosario MA, Wojtas CN, Deevers AC, Hamad KM. Cureus; 2024 Jul 14; 16(7):e63865. PubMed ID: 39099896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing Ophthalmology Patient Education via ChatBot-Generated Materials: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials and The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Brochures. Eid K, Eid A, Wang D, Raiker RS, Chen S, Nguyen J. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jul 14; 40(2):212-216. PubMed ID: 37972974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information. Berry CE, Fazilat AZ, Lavin C, Lintel H, Cole N, Stingl CS, Valencia C, Morgan AG, Momeni A, Wan DC. J Reconstr Microsurg; 2024 Nov 14; 40(9):657-664. PubMed ID: 38382637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT: assessing the content and quality of artificial intelligence-generated medical information on appendicitis. Ghanem YK, Rouhi AD, Al-Houssan A, Saleh Z, Moccia MC, Joshi H, Dumon KR, Hong Y, Spitz F, Joshi AR, Kwiatt M. Surg Endosc; 2024 May 14; 38(5):2887-2893. PubMed ID: 38443499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating ChatGPT-4's performance as a digital health advisor for otosclerosis surgery. Sahin S, Erkmen B, Duymaz YK, Bayram F, Tekin AM, Topsakal V. Front Surg; 2024 May 14; 11():1373843. PubMed ID: 38903865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Fahy S, Oehme S, Milinkovic D, Jung T, Bartek B. J Pers Med; 2024 Jan 18; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How Efficient Is ChatGPT in Accessing Accurate and Quality Health-Related Information? Ulusoy I, Yılmaz M, Kıvrak A. Cureus; 2023 Oct 18; 15(10):e46662. PubMed ID: 37942394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy. Onder CE, Koc G, Gokbulut P, Taskaldiran I, Kuskonmaz SM. Sci Rep; 2024 Jan 02; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Generative artificial intelligence chatbots may provide appropriate informational responses to common vascular surgery questions by patients. Chervonski E, Harish KB, Rockman CB, Sadek M, Teter KA, Jacobowitz GR, Berland TL, Lohr J, Moore C, Maldonado TS. Vascular; 2024 Mar 18; ():17085381241240550. PubMed ID: 38500300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance. Hemaya M, Hemaya M, Habeeb A. Cureus; 2022 Oct 18; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]