These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 38070672

  • 1. Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.
    Velayuthan R, Sukumar SK, Bootla D, Balaguru S, Anantharaj A, Satheesh S, Selvaraj RJ.
    Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 38070672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
    Mutagaywa RK, Tumaini B, Chin A.
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2024; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
    Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T, Schüller H.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction.
    Kim WH, Joung B, Shim J, Park JS, Hwang ES, Pak HN, Kim S, Lee M.
    Yonsei Med J; 2010 Nov; 51(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 20879047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Senaratne J, Herath TT, Beaudette D, Irwin M, Gulamhusein S, Senaratne MP.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(42):e12833. PubMed ID: 30334983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The PhysioVP-AF study, a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefit of physiological ventricular pacing vs. managed ventricular pacing for persistent atrial fibrillation prevention in patients with prolonged atrioventricular conduction: design and rationale.
    Pastore G, Bertini M, Bonanno C, Coluccia G, Dell'Era G, De Mattia L, Grieco D, Katsouras G, Maines M, Marcantoni L, Marinaccio L, Paglino G, Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Zoppo F, Noventa F.
    Europace; 2023 May 19; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 36974970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Results of long-term permanent atrial stimulation in sick sinus disease].
    Goicolea de Oro A, Bescós LL, Pastor Fuentes A, Esteban Paúl E, Kallmeyer Martín C, Chicote Ramos R.
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 Jul 19; 50(7):474-9. PubMed ID: 9304174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
    Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar 19; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pacemaker-based analysis of atrioventricular conduction and atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with primary sinus node dysfunction.
    Stockburger M, Trautmann F, Nitardy A, Just-Teetzmann M, Schade S, Celebi O, Krebs A, Dietz R.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May 19; 32(5):604-13. PubMed ID: 19422581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Edwards SJ, Karner C, Trevor N, Wakefield V, Salih F.
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug 19; 19(65):1-210. PubMed ID: 26293406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA, MOde Selection Trial Investigators.
    Circulation; 2003 Jun 17; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial.
    Stockburger M, Defaye P, Boveda S, Stancak B, Lazarus A, Sipötz J, Nardi S, Rolando M, Moreno J.
    Europace; 2016 May 17; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of first- and second-generation leadless pacemakers in patients with sinus rhythm and complete atrioventricular block.
    Lenormand T, Abou Khalil K, Bodin A, Babuty D, Bisson A, Clementy N.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug 17; 34(8):1730-1737. PubMed ID: 37354448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Højberg S, Møller M, Vesterlund T, Dalsgaard D, Mortensen LS, Nielsen T, Asklund M, Friis EV, Christensen PD, Simonsen EH, Eriksen UH, Jensen GV, Svendsen JH, Toff WD, Healey JS, Andersen HR, DANPACE Investigators.
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar 17; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.