These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
310 related items for PubMed ID: 3807394
1. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up. Hammond GL, Geha AS, Kopf GS, Hashim SW. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and biological prosthetic valves after isolated valve replacement--cooperative study on total 1281 patients]. Nakano S, Kawashima Y, Komatsu S, Sakai K, Eguchi S, Aosaki M, Misaki T, Ohara K, Tokunaga K. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 37(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 2671191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves. Goldman B, Scully H, Tong C, Mandell R, Butany J, Azuma J, Schwartz L. Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G, Di Segni M, Boccardi L, Ferrari O, Giovannini E. G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H, Rudolph W. Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]