These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

259 related items for PubMed ID: 3808044

  • 1. TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation.
    Milinski M.
    Nature; ; 325(6103):433-5. PubMed ID: 3808044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The spatial struggle of tit-for-tat and defect.
    Hutson VC, Vickers GT.
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1995 Jun 29; 348(1326):393-404. PubMed ID: 7480111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    McNamara JM, Barta Z, Houston AI.
    Nature; 2004 Apr 15; 428(6984):745-8. PubMed ID: 15085131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Nowak M, Sigmund K.
    Nature; 1993 Jul 01; 364(6432):56-8. PubMed ID: 8316296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. No strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma.
    Lorberbaum J.
    J Theor Biol; 1994 May 21; 168(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 8022193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mutual Restraint in Tree Swallows: A Test of the TIT FOR TAT Model of Reciprocity.
    Lombardo MP.
    Science; 1985 Mar 15; 227(4692):1363-5. PubMed ID: 17793772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evolution of strategies in the three-person iterated prisoner's dilemma game.
    Matsushima M, Ikegami T.
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Nov 07; 195(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 9802950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality.
    Raihani NJ, Bshary R.
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Aug 07; 24(8):1628-39. PubMed ID: 21599777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Optimality under noise: higher memory strategies for the alternating prisoner's dilemma.
    Neill DB.
    J Theor Biol; 2001 Jul 21; 211(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 11419957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Combination with anti-tit-for-tat remedies problems of tit-for-tat.
    Yi SD, Baek SK, Choi JK.
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jan 07; 412():1-7. PubMed ID: 27670803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contingencies of reinforcement in a five-person prisoner's dilemma.
    Yi R, Rachlin H.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep 07; 82(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 15540503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.