These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 38110124

  • 1. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK, Agar A, Kalloniatis M, Phu J.
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
    Lavanya R, Riyazuddin M, Dasari S, Puttaiah NK, Venugopal JP, Pradhan ZS, Devi S, Sreenivasaiah S, Ganeshrao SB, Rao HL.
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical Evaluation of Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Faster Compared With Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Standard in Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
    Phu J, Khuu SK, Agar A, Kalloniatis M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 208():251-264. PubMed ID: 31470001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.
    Pham AT, Ramulu PY, Boland MV, Yohannan J.
    Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1417-1425. PubMed ID: 33798655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.
    Rabiolo A, Morales E, Kim JH, Afifi AA, Yu F, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J.
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Jun; 127(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 31952885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.
    Heijl A, Patella VM, Chong LX, Iwase A, Leung CK, Tuulonen A, Lee GC, Callan T, Bengtsson B.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():154-165. PubMed ID: 30336129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A Strategy for Seeding Point Error Assessment for Retesting (SPEAR) in Perimetry Applied to Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
    Phu J, Kalloniatis M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 221():115-130. PubMed ID: 32777379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Effect of Achieving Target Intraocular Pressure on Visual Field Worsening.
    Villasana GA, Bradley C, Ramulu P, Unberath M, Yohannan J.
    Ophthalmology; 2022 Jan; 129(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 34506846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Visual Field Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.
    Swaminathan SS, Jammal AA, Medeiros FA, Gedde SJ, Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Oct; 131(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 38582154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.