These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


136 related items for PubMed ID: 38128100

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Five-Year Graft Survival of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet Stripping EK and the Effect of Donor Sex Matching.
    Price DA, Kelley M, Price FW, Price MO.
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Oct; 125(10):1508-1514. PubMed ID: 29731147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Ten-Year Endothelial Cell Loss Compared with Penetrating Keratoplasty.
    Price MO, Calhoun P, Kollman C, Price FW, Lass JH.
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Jul; 123(7):1421-7. PubMed ID: 27108095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Hamzaoglu EC, Straiko MD, Mayko ZM, Sáles CS, Terry MA.
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Nov; 122(11):2193-9. PubMed ID: 26271841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Dunker SL, Dickman MM, Wisse RPL, Nobacht S, Wijdh RHJ, Bartels MC, Tang ML, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Kruit PJ, Nuijts RMMA.
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Sep; 127(9):1152-1159. PubMed ID: 32386811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as treatment for graft failure after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Weller JM, Tourtas T, Kruse FE, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Fuchsluger T, Bachmann BO.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 159(6):1050-1057.e2. PubMed ID: 25790736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW.
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 22218143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-term outcome of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) following failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
    Schrittenlocher S, Schlereth SL, Siebelmann S, Hayashi T, Matthaei M, Bachmann B, Cursiefen C.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 98(7):e901-e906. PubMed ID: 32198835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Impact of the ratio between graft and host corneal size on immune rejection, re-bubbling rate and postoperative endothelial cell loss in 457 eyes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)].
    Reinert U, Seitz B, Munteanu C, Daas L.
    Ophthalmologie; 2024 Jul; 121(7):565-570. PubMed ID: 38639889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.