These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis. Gökçimen G, Durkan R, Deste Gökay G, Oyar P. J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis. Deste Gökay G, Oyar P, Gökçimen G, Durkan R. BMC Oral Health; 2024 May 10; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Carvalho MA, Sotto-Maior BS, Del Bel Cury AA, Pessanha Henriques GE. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov 10; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations. Roberts EE, Bailey CW, Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL, Vandewalle KS. J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug 10; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue. Spitznagel FA, Bonfante EA, Vollmer F, Gierthmuehlen PC. J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb 10; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Pumnil S, Rungsiyakull P, Rungsiyakull C, Elsaka S. J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun 10; 31(5):e2-e11. PubMed ID: 35505638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Martínez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, Bartolomé JF, Pradíes G. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jun 10; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Different combinations of CAD/CAM materials on the biomechanical behavior of a two-piece prosthetic solution. Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Borges ALS, Bottino MA. Int J Comput Dent; 2019 Jun 10; 22(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 31134223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface. Hjerppe J, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH, Özcan M, Mühlemann S. J Dent; 2022 Jun 10; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns (screw-retained) versus monolithic hybrid abutments with adhesively cemented monolithic crowns. Naumann M, Scholz P, Krois J, Schwendicke F, Sterzenbach G, Happe A. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar 10; 34(3):209-220. PubMed ID: 36692161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns: Influence of crown height, crown morphology and material on the implant-abutment complex. Graf T, Völler E, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Schubert O, Güth JF. J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Oct 16; 68(4):606-614. PubMed ID: 38479887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments. Akan E, Velioğlu E, Çömlekoğlu ME, Çömlekoğlu MD. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Oct 16; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar 16; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study. Pitta J, Hjerppe J, Burkhardt F, Fehmer V, Mojon P, Sailer I. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb 16; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs. Emam M, Eldimeery A, Salah T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Feb 16; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants. Vahey BR, Sordi MB, Stanley K, Magini RS, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Fredel MC, Henriques B, Souza JCM. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov 16; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental biomechanics of root-analog implants in different bone types. Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Blom EJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May 16; 131(5):905-915. PubMed ID: 36428106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE®) for the Design and Fabrication of Implant-Supported Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Cemented on Customized Hybrid Abutments: A Retrospective Clinical Study on 25 Patients. Mangano F, Margiani B, Admakin O. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan 24; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]