These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 38143302

  • 1. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
    Moberly AC, Pisoni DB, Tamati TN.
    Ear Hear; ; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates.
    Moberly AC, Vasil KJ, Ray C.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 31210633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
    Dornhoffer JR, Reddy P, Meyer TA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar 01; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Exceptional Speech Recognition Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation: Lessons From Two Case Studies.
    Herbert CJ, Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG, Nelson RF.
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep 01; 31(3):552-566. PubMed ID: 35944073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN, Stevenson RA, Wallace MT.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Sep 01; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC, Mattingly JK, Castellanos I.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019 Sep 01; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC, Pogue J, Milrany T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep 01; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D, Lupo J, Biever A.
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021 Sep 01; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A, Layer N, Meister H, Müller V, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Sandmann P.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun 01; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR, Moberly AC.
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar 01; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Moberly AC, Castellanos I, Mattingly JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec 01; 39(10):e1010-e1018. PubMed ID: 30444846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessment of Cochlear Implants for Adult Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older Who Meet Expanded Indications of Open-Set Sentence Recognition: A Multicenter Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
    Zwolan TA, Kallogjeri D, Firszt JB, Buchman CA.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct 01; 146(10):933-941. PubMed ID: 32857106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP, Carlson ML, Dowling BP, Olund AP, DeJong MD, Breneman A, Hollander S, Beatty CW, Neff BA, Driscoll CL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun 01; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality) .
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020 Jun 01; 20(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 32194878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Mattingly JK, Castellanos I, Moberly AC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec 01; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Zhang E, Coelho DH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep 01; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.
    Lachs L, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun 01; 22(3):236-51. PubMed ID: 11409859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences.
    Lewis JH, Castellanos I, Moberly AC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep 01; 32(8):528-536. PubMed ID: 34965599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Audio-visual speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.
    Yamamoto R, Naito Y, Tona R, Moroto S, Tamaya R, Fujiwara K, Shinohara S, Takebayashi S, Kikuchi M, Michida T.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov 01; 102():160-168. PubMed ID: 29106867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With Severe Compared With Profound Hearing Loss.
    Birman CS, Sanli H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Apr 01; 41(4):e458-e463. PubMed ID: 32176130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.