These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


180 related items for PubMed ID: 38143302

  • 41. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ, Karoui C, Laborde ML, Lepage B, Molinier CÉ, Tartayre M, Escudé B, Deguine O, Marx M, Fraysse B.
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.
    Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Cowdrey L, King S.
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 22441359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Computer-based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Is Associated With Durable Improvements in Cochlear Implant Quality of Life.
    Dornhoffer JR, Shannon C, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR.
    Ear Hear; 2012; 45(4):905-914. PubMed ID: 38351509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Cochlear Implant Adult Speech Perception Outcomes: Seniors Have Similar Good Outcomes.
    Birman CS, Hassarati RT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun 01; 44(5):438-446. PubMed ID: 36893195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Outcomes after cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness, including those with recalcitrant Ménière's disease.
    Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Dunn C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec 01; 34(9):1681-7. PubMed ID: 24232066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy.
    Sladen DP, Gifford RH, Haynes D, Kelsall D, Benson A, Lewis K, Zwolan T, Fu QJ, Gantz B, Gilden J, Westerberg B, Gustin C, O'Neil L, Driscoll CL.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct 01; 127(10):2368-2374. PubMed ID: 28233910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Oct 01; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Longitudinal Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ma C, Fried J, Nguyen SA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Camposeo EL, Meyer TA, Dubno JR, McRackan TR.
    Laryngoscope; 2023 May 01; 133(5):1014-1024. PubMed ID: 36004817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Speech Perception Performance Growth and Benchmark Score Achievement After Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness.
    Nassiri AM, Wallerius KP, Lohse CM, Marinelli JP, Saoji AA, Driscoll CLW, Neff BA, Carlson ML.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan 01; 43(1):e64-e71. PubMed ID: 34889843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE, Davidson LS, Uchanski RM, Nicholas JG.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 01; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Cochlear implantation after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma.
    Patel NS, Carlson ML, Link MJ, Neff BA, Van Gompel JJ, Driscoll CLW.
    J Neurosurg; 2021 Jul 01; 135(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34250789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. (Even Off-Label) Cochlear Implantation in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Results in Measurable Objective and Subjective Benefit.
    Sydlowski SA, Farrokhian N, Carrozza M, Jamis C, Woodson E.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep 01; 43(8):e895-e902. PubMed ID: 35970168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, Cook SJ, Loiselle LM, DeJong MD, Hedley-Williams A, Sunderhaus LS, Hayes CA, Gifford RH.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep 01; 35(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 24658601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Roland JT.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul 01; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Factors That Influence Second-side Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes.
    Dornhoffer J, Liu YF, Zhao EE, Camposeo EL, Meyer TA, McRackan TR.
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Mar 01; 42(3):e279-e285. PubMed ID: 33555748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.
    Oba SI, Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Mar 01; 32(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21389857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.
    Harris MS, Moberly AC, Hamel BL, Vasil K, Runge CL, Riggs WJ, Shafiro V.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar 17; 64(3):1040-1052. PubMed ID: 33651956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K, McCreery RW.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Mar 17; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Bilateral cochlear implantation versus unilateral cochlear implantation in deaf children: Effects of sentence context and listening conditions on recognition of spoken words in sentences.
    Lee Y, Sim H.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct 17; 137():110237. PubMed ID: 32658807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Sheffield SW, Haynes DS, Wanna GB, Labadie RF, Gifford RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar 17; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.