These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


615 related items for PubMed ID: 3817122

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
    Nestor B, Gold RB.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.
    Gold RB, Nestor B.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3884361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1990.
    Gold RB, Daley D.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(5):204-11. PubMed ID: 1743272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
    Gold RB, Sonfield A.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Public funding for U.S. contraceptive services down since 1980 -- $95 million a year goes to sterilization.
    Sukop S.
    AVSC News; 1992 Mar; 30(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12285114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
    Forrest JD, Samara R.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996 Mar; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Organized family planning services in the United States, 1976-1977.
    Torres A.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1979 Mar; 11(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 401079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of federal funding cuts on family planning services, 1980-1983.
    Torres A.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984 Mar; 16(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 6381091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.
    Gold RB.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1980 Mar; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
    Chamie M, Henshaw SK.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981 Mar; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Publicly funded abortions in FY 1980 and FY 1981.
    Gold RB.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1982 Mar; 14(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 6811313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
    Mcfarlane DR, Meier KJ.
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1991 Mar; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.