These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


155 related items for PubMed ID: 38187973

  • 1. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA ProSeal in anaesthetised paralysed patients - A randomised controlled trial.
    Bhardwaj M, Dhania S, Kaur K, Lal J, Priya, Singhal SK.
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 67(Suppl 4):S245-S250. PubMed ID: 38187973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, Chung F.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Anand LK, Goel N, Singh M, Kapoor D.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of incidence of sore throat with laryngeal mask airway Protector and laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: A randomised clinical trial.
    Mohan V, Rudingwa P, Panneerselvam S, Kuberan A, Srinivasan G, Arulprakasam S.
    Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jul; 68(7):637-643. PubMed ID: 39081918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S, Baidya DK, Arora MK, Bhattacharjee S, Khanna P.
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E, Van Caelenberg E, De Baerdemaeker L, Coppens M.
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021 Sep; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of self-pressurized Air-Q® and Proseal™ LMA® in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomized clinical trial.
    Rana S, Anand LK, Singh M, Kapoor D, Gupta D, Kaur H.
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2024 Sep; 40(2):336-343. PubMed ID: 38919429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.
    Sood S, Chahar S, Thakur A, Gupta M, Saxena A, Subramanian S.
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Sep; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients; A prospective randomized study.
    Kerai S, Bhatt G, Saxena KN, Gaba P, Wadhwa B.
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Feb; 67(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 37091441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK, Wen Z, Wang H, Ma L, Miao L, Wang G.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May 01; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
    Chan WK, Liu CY.
    Cureus; 2022 Mar 01; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Gill RK, Tarat A, Pathak D, Dutta S.
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017 Mar 01; 11(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28298751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ, Wyssusek KH, Pelecanos A, Roets M, Kumar CM.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr 01; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of diffusion of anaesthetic gases on fibre-optic view change of laryngeal mask airway and post-operative laryngo-pharyngeal morbidity in children - A randomised controlled trial.
    Bharti N, Bala I, Lokala R, Sahni N, Samujh R.
    Indian J Anaesth; 2021 Sep 01; 65(9):644-649. PubMed ID: 34764498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb 01; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
    Chen MK, Hsu HT, Lu IC, Shih CK, Shen YC, Tseng KY, Cheng KI.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Feb 01; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, Carnero M, Gracia JL, Ayala JL, Alvarez R, Yuste J.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar 01; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.