These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

108 related items for PubMed ID: 38267350

  • 1. Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 23. PubMed ID: 38267350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of scanning distance on the accuracy of a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, Barmak AB, Guinot-Barona C, Att W, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Dent; 2024 Mar 23; 142():104854. PubMed ID: 38246309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M, Rubenstein J, Methani MM, Piedra-Cascón W, Özcan M, Att W.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan 23; 129(1):160-165. PubMed ID: 34154820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, Rubenstein J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar 23; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M, Barmak AB, Lanis A, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar 04. PubMed ID: 38443245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Lawand G, Ismail Y, Revilla-León M, Tohme H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun 04; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Strommer S, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 11. PubMed ID: 38609764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans.
    Gómez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Barmak AB, Att W, Revilla-León M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 11; 131(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 35337658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.