These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
148 related items for PubMed ID: 38382637
1. Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information. Berry CE, Fazilat AZ, Lavin C, Lintel H, Cole N, Stingl CS, Valencia C, Morgan AG, Momeni A, Wan DC. J Reconstr Microsurg; 2024 Nov; 40(9):657-664. PubMed ID: 38382637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AI-Generated Information for Vascular Patients: Assessing the Standard of Procedure-Specific Information Provided by the ChatGPT AI-Language Model. Haidar O, Jaques A, McCaughran PW, Metcalfe MJ. Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49764. PubMed ID: 38046759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Cardiac Catheterization From Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Behers BJ, Vargas IA, Behers BM, Rosario MA, Wojtas CN, Deevers AC, Hamad KM. Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e63865. PubMed ID: 39099896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment. Gibson D, Jackson S, Shanmugasundaram R, Seth I, Siu A, Ahmadi N, Kam J, Mehan N, Thanigasalam R, Jeffery N, Patel MI, Leslie S. J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug 14; 26():e55939. PubMed ID: 39141904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Current Status of Artificial Intelligence for Endourology Patient Education: A Blind Comparison of ChatGPT and Google Bard Against Traditional Information Resources. Connors C, Gupta K, Khusid JA, Khargi R, Yaghoubian AJ, Levy M, Gallante B, Atallah W, Gupta M. J Endourol; 2024 Aug 14; 38(8):843-851. PubMed ID: 38441078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT: assessing the content and quality of artificial intelligence-generated medical information on appendicitis. Ghanem YK, Rouhi AD, Al-Houssan A, Saleh Z, Moccia MC, Joshi H, Dumon KR, Hong Y, Spitz F, Joshi AR, Kwiatt M. Surg Endosc; 2024 May 14; 38(5):2887-2893. PubMed ID: 38443499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations. Huang G, Fang CH, Agarwal N, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr 14; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia. Joseph P, Silva NA, Nanda A, Gupta G. World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec 14; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy. Onder CE, Koc G, Gokbulut P, Taskaldiran I, Kuskonmaz SM. Sci Rep; 2024 Jan 02; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the readability, reliability, and quality of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to the 100 most searched queries about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An observational study. Ömür Arça D, Erdemir İ, Kara F, Shermatov N, Odacioğlu M, İbişoğlu E, Hanci FB, Sağiroğlu G, Hanci V. Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 May 31; 103(22):e38352. PubMed ID: 39259094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing Readability of Online Patient-Facing Content: The Role of AI Chatbots in Improving Cancer Information Accessibility. Abreu AA, Murimwa GZ, Farah E, Stewart JW, Zhang L, Rodriguez J, Sweetenham J, Zeh HJ, Wang SC, Polanco PM. J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2024 May 15; 22(2 D):. PubMed ID: 38749478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing Health Literacy: Evaluating the Readability of Patient Handouts Revised by ChatGPT's Large Language Model. Swisher AR, Wu AW, Liu GC, Lee MK, Carle TR, Tang DM. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Dec 15; 171(6):1751-1757. PubMed ID: 39105460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care. Ramirez JL, Wang K, Sung E, Hernandez S, Le M, Avra TD, Talutis S, Iannuzzi JC, Ulloa JG. Ann Vasc Surg; 2024 Apr 15; 101():157-163. PubMed ID: 38154492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study. Rouhi AD, Ghanem YK, Yolchieva L, Saleh Z, Joshi H, Moccia MC, Suarez-Pierre A, Han JJ. Cardiol Ther; 2024 Mar 15; 13(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 38194058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality and readability of patient information provided by ChatGPT: can AI reliably explain common ENT operations? Abou-Abdallah M, Dar T, Mahmudzade Y, Michaels J, Talwar R, Tornari C. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Nov 15; 281(11):6147-6153. PubMed ID: 38530460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]